Development of destination choice models for pedestrian travel

被引:36
|
作者
Clifton, Kelly J. [1 ]
Singleton, Patrick A. [1 ]
Muhs, Christopher D. [1 ,3 ]
Schneider, Robert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, POB 751 CEE, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, POB 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[3] DKS Associates, 720 SW Washington St,Suite 500, Portland, OR 97205 USA
关键词
Walking; Pedestrians; DDestination choice; Travel behaviors; Built environment; Active transportation; DEMAND; TRANSPORTATION; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK; WALKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Most research on walking behavior has focused on mode choice or walk trip frequency. In contrast, this study is one of the first to analyze and model the destination choice behaviors of pedestrians within an entire region. Using about 4500 walk trips from a 2011 household travel survey in the Portland, Oregon, region, we estimated multinomial logit pedestrian destination choice models for six trip purposes. Independent variables included terms for impedance (walk trip distance), size (employment by type, households), supportive pedestrian environments (parks, a pedestrian index of the environment variable called PIE), barriers to walking (terrain, industrial-type employment), and traveler characteristics. Unique to this study was the use of small-scale destination zone alternatives. Distance was a significant deterrent to pedestrian destination choice, and people in carless or childless households were less sensitive to distance for some purposes. Employment (especially retail) was a strong attractor: doubling the number of jobs nearly doubled the odds of choosing a destination for home-based shopping walk trips. More attractive pedestrian environments were also positively associated with pedestrian destination choice after controlling for other factors. These results shed light on determinants of pedestrian destination choice behaviors, and sensitivities in the models highlight potential policy-levers to increase walking activity. In addition, the destination choice models can be applied in practice within existing regional travel demand models or as pedestrian planning tools to evaluate land use and transportation policy and investment scenarios. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 265
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ESTIMATING SHOPPING DESTINATION CHOICE MODELS FROM TRAVEL DIARY DATA
    MILLER, EJ
    OKELLY, ME
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1983, 35 (04): : 440 - 449
  • [2] The psychological process of travel destination choice
    Qiu, Richard T. R.
    Masiero, Lorenzo
    Li, Gang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2018, 35 (06) : 691 - 705
  • [3] ESTIMATING SHOPPING DESTINATION CHOICE MODELS FROM TRAVEL DIARY DATA - A COMMENT
    PICKLES, AR
    DAVIES, RB
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1985, 37 (02): : 194 - 195
  • [4] ESTIMATING SHOPPING DESTINATION CHOICE MODELS FROM TRAVEL DIARY DATA - REPLY
    MILLER, EJ
    OKELLY, ME
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1985, 37 (02): : 195 - 196
  • [5] Destination and route choice models for bidirectional pedestrian flow based on the social force model
    Cao Ning-bo
    Qu Zhao-wei
    Chen Yong-heng
    Zhao Li-ying
    Song Xian-min
    Bai Qiao-wen
    [J]. IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2017, 11 (09) : 537 - 545
  • [7] Travel visa impacts on destination choice and perception
    Rizzi, Marina Duerrmeier
    [J]. WORLDWIDE HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM THEMES, 2014, 6 (04) : 305 - 316
  • [8] DESTINATION CHOICE SET DEFINITION IN TRAVEL BEHAVIOR MODELING
    ANSAH, JA
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 1977, 11 (02): : 127 - 140
  • [9] Multiscale Analysis of Urban Walkability and Pedestrian's Destination Choice
    Xiao, Weiye
    Wei, Yehua Dennis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 147 (01)
  • [10] Development and evaluation of aggregate destination choice models for trip distribution in Florida
    Chow, LF
    Zhao, F
    Li, MT
    Li, SC
    [J]. PLANNING AND ANALYSIS 2005, 2005, (1931): : 18 - 27