Collaboration Between Community Advocates and Academic Researchers: Scientific Advocacy or Political Research?
被引:11
|
作者:
Stahl, Roland
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Bryn Mawr Coll, Grad Sch Social Work & Social Res, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010 USABryn Mawr Coll, Grad Sch Social Work & Social Res, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010 USA
Stahl, Roland
[1
]
Shdaimah, Corey
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Maryland, Sch Social Work, Baltimore, MD 21201 USABryn Mawr Coll, Grad Sch Social Work & Social Res, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010 USA
Shdaimah, Corey
[2
]
机构:
[1] Bryn Mawr Coll, Grad Sch Social Work & Social Res, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Social Work, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
collaborative research;
participatory action research;
community advocacy;
public policy;
D O I:
10.1093/bjsw/bcm069
中图分类号:
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号:
1204 ;
摘要:
There is a growing interest on the part of community groups, academics and funders in developing collaborative research projects between researchers and community groups. The authors of this paper collaborated with a community-based advocacy group on a study that focused on home repair problems faced by low-income homeowners in Philadelphia, PA (the 'Home Repair Study'). In this article, we provide a critical analysis of the collaborative process between social work advocates and academic social work researchers based on participatory observation and in-depth interviews with those advocates who participated directly in the planning and implementation of the Home Repair Study. Similar to accounts provided in previously published articles, our findings suggest that such collaborations will frequently encounter tensions resulting from the different roles that researchers and community-based advocates fulfil in the research field and in the political arena. However, we argue that these tensions are healthy; if managed effectively, they contribute to more comprehensive research and more effective policy advocacy.