Variously Worldwide Types of Deregulated Electricity Markets and Their Respective Transmission Congestion Management Schemes

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Jiawei [1 ]
Lo, Kwok Lun [1 ]
Lu, Jianfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Deregulated Electricity Market; Transmission Congestion Management; Uniform Marginal Price; Locational Marginal Price; Zonal Price and transaction curtailment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this paper, four practical and successful deregulated electricity markets: the old England & Wales Pool, the British Electricity Trading and Transmission Arrangements (BETTA), Nordic Pool and PJM interconnection will be briefly explained and discussed on their histories, structures, rules and also advantages and disadvantages. The old England & Wales Pool was a typical Pool type market which was one of the first successful electricity market deregulations but now had been replaced by the BETTA which is based on the bilateral and balancing mechanism. Nordic Pool and PJM are hybrid markets which combine both pool and bilateral principles. With maturing deregulated mechanism, transmission congestion becomes an urgent problem for all markets. Uniform marginal price, locational marginal price and zonal price are three typical methods in Pool and Hybrid market for congestion management. Locational marginal price is regarded as more efficient than other two when it comes to the market power dilution. In bilateral market, four transaction curtailments based on four rules: first come first serve, pro rata, minimum-net curtailment and price based are utilized to relieve congestion.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Congestion management in deregulated electricity markets
    Lo, KL
    Yuen, YS
    Snider, LA
    [J]. DRPT2000: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRIC UTILITY DEREGULATION AND RESTRUCTURING AND POWER TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 47 - 52
  • [2] Transmission congestion management assessment in deregulated electricity market
    Hussin, T.
    Hassan, M. Y.
    Lo, K. L.
    [J]. 2006 4TH STUDENT CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, : 249 - +
  • [3] Comparison of IPFC and GUPFC for Congestion Management in Deregulated Electricity Markets
    Kumar, Ashwani
    [J]. 2014 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICIIS), 2014, : 59 - +
  • [4] Transmission congestion management in competitive electricity markets
    Singh, H
    Hao, SY
    Papalexopoulos, A
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1998, 13 (02) : 672 - 680
  • [5] Locating series FACTS devices for congestion management in deregulated electricity markets
    Achuya, Naresh
    Mithulananthan, N.
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2007, 77 (3-4) : 352 - 360
  • [6] Congestion management with FACTS devices in deregulated electricity markets ensuring loadability limit
    Kumar, Ashwani
    Sekhar, Charan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2013, 46 : 258 - 273
  • [7] Dynamic voltage stability constrained congestion management framework for deregulated electricity markets
    Amjady, Nima
    Hakimi, Mahmood
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 58 : 66 - 75
  • [8] FACTS Devices Cost Recovery During Congestion Management in Deregulated Electricity Markets
    Sharma A.K.
    Mittapalli R.K.
    Pal Y.
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B, 2016, 97 (03) : 339 - 354
  • [9] A congestion management and transmission price simulator for competitive electricity markets
    Ferreira, M. Judite
    Vale, Zita A.
    Cardoso, Jose
    [J]. 2007 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-10, 2007, : 4066 - +
  • [10] Transaction management in deregulated electricity markets
    Kuhlmann, D
    Ejebe, GC
    Tomasic, D
    [J]. PICA 2001: 22ND IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER INDUSTRY COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, 2001, : 171 - 175