Enhanced recovery after microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - A prospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Hojvig, Jens H. [1 ]
Charabi, Birgitte W. [2 ,6 ]
Wessel, Irene [2 ]
Jensen, Lisa T.
Nyberg, Jan [3 ]
Maymann-Holler, Nana [4 ]
Kehlet, Henrik [5 ,6 ]
Bonde, Christian T. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Plast Surg & Burns Treatment, Blegdamsvej 60,afsnit 9441, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Surg Pathophysiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
JPRAS OPEN | 2022年 / 34卷
关键词
Enhanced recovery after surgery; ERAS; Head and neck cancer; Head and neck reconstruction; Head and neck surgery; Microsurgery; Oral cavity cancer; Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma; Perioperative care; Reconstructive surgery; FREE TISSUE TRANSFER; FLUID MANAGEMENT; SURGERY ERAS; COMPLICATIONS; TRACHEOSTOMY; OPERATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer typically have several comorbidities, and the procedures are often followed by complications and prolonged hospitalization. Consequently, the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for these patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction has gained attention in recent years. ERAS is a periand postoperative care concept that has repeatedly shown beneficial results for a wide variety of surgical procedures, including microvascular reconstruction. This study presents the results after the introduction of our ERAS protocol for head and neck cancer reconstruction. Methods: We prospectively treated 30 consecutive patients according to our ERAS protocol from June 2019 to December 2020 and compared the results of the treated patients with those of patients treated with our traditional recovery after surgery (TRAS) protocol. We are based on our ERAS protocol on the following core elements of recovery: improved patient information, goal-directed fluid therapy, minimally invasive surgery, opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia, early ambulation, and pre-defined functional discharge criteria. Results: The baseline characteristics of the groups were comparable. The ERAS group had a significantly shorter length of stay (13.1 vs. 20.3 days, p < 0.001), significantly shorter time to ambulation (3.0 days vs. 6.4 days, p < 0.001), shorter time to removal of nasogastric tube (13.3 days vs. 22.7 days, p = 0.05), and fewer tracheostomies performed (10% vs. 90%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in complications, flap survival, or 30-day re-admissions between the two groups. Conclusion: The introduction of ERAS in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing microvascular reconstruction seems safe and results in improved recovery. Level of evidence: 3 (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 113
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol
    Hojvig, Jens H.
    Pedersen, Nicolas J.
    Charabi, Birgitte W.
    Wessel, Irene
    Jensen, Lisa T.
    Nyberg, Jan
    Mayman-Holler, Nana
    Kehlet, Henrik
    Bonde, Christian T.
    [J]. JPRAS OPEN, 2020, 26 : 91 - 100
  • [2] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery Requiring Microvascular Reconstruction
    Hanba, Curtis
    Lewis, Carol
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 56 (04) : 801 - 812
  • [3] Enhanced Recovery After Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction With a Free Flap-What Is Next?
    Hojvig, Jens H.
    Kehlet, Henrik
    Bonde, Christian T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 78 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [4] Safety of Vasopressor Use in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study
    Monroe, Marcus M.
    Cannady, Steven B.
    Ghanem, Tamer A.
    Swide, Christopher E.
    Wax, Mark K.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2011, 144 (06) : 877 - 882
  • [5] Swallowing outcomes after microvascular head and neck reconstruction: A prospective review of 191 cases
    Khariwala, Samir S.
    Vivek, Prashant P.
    Lorenz, Robert R.
    Esclamado, Ramon M.
    Wood, Benjamin
    Strome, Marshall
    Alam, Daniel S.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2007, 117 (08): : 1359 - 1363
  • [6] Surgical morbidity and mortality in patients after microvascular reconstruction for head and neck cancer
    Joo, Y-H.
    Cho, K-J.
    Park, J-O.
    Kim, S-Y.
    Kim, M-S.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 43 (02) : 502 - 508
  • [7] Patients' experience of temporary tracheostomy after microvascular reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck
    Rogers, S. N.
    Russell, L.
    Lowe, D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 55 (01): : 10 - 16
  • [8] Factors affecting cancer recurrence after microvascular flap reconstruction of the head and neck
    Roostaeian, J
    Suh, JD
    Sercarz, JA
    Abemayor, E
    Lee, JT
    Blackwell, KE
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (08): : 1391 - 1394
  • [9] Myocardial infarction after microvascular head,and neck reconstruction
    Chiang, S
    Cohen, B
    Blackwell, K
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2002, 112 (10): : 1849 - 1852
  • [10] MICROVASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION IN THE HEAD AND NECK
    RIDLEY, MB
    GLENN, MG
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1993, 77 (03) : 677 - 687