Variability of insulin sensitivity during the first 4 days of critical illness: implications for tight glycemic control

被引:61
|
作者
Pretty, Christopher G. [1 ]
Le Compte, Aaron J. [1 ]
Chase, J. Geoffrey [1 ]
Shaw, Geoffrey M. [2 ]
Preiser, Jean-Charles [3 ]
Penning, Sophie [4 ]
Desaive, Thomas [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Mech Engn, Ctr Bioengn, Christchurch 8054, New Zealand
[2] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Christchurch 8054, New Zealand
[3] Free Univ Brussels, CUB Hosp Erasme, Dept Intens Care, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Cardiovasc Res Univ Liege, Liege, Belgium
来源
关键词
Critical care; Hyperglycemia; Insulin resistance; Mathematical model; Algorithms; MODEL-BASED INSULIN; MINIMAL MODEL; ILL PATIENTS; GLUCOSE VARIABILITY; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; INFUSION PROTOCOL; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; SPRINT PROTOCOL; CALORIC-INTAKE; CRITICAL-CARE;
D O I
10.1186/2110-5820-2-17
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Effective tight glycemic control (TGC) can improve outcomes in critical care patients, but it is difficult to achieve consistently. Insulin sensitivity defines the metabolic balance between insulin concentration and insulin-mediated glucose disposal. Hence, variability of insulin sensitivity can cause variable glycemia. This study quantifies and compares the daily evolution of insulin sensitivity level and variability for critical care patients receiving TGC. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data from the SPRINT TGC study involving patients admitted to a mixed medical-surgical ICU between August 2005 and May 2007. Only patients who commenced TGC within 12 hours of ICU admission and spent at least 24 hours on the SPRINT protocol were included (N = 164). Model-based insulin sensitivity (SI) was identified each hour. Absolute level and hour-to-hour percent changes in SI were assessed on cohort and per-patient bases. Levels and variability of SI were compared over time on 24-hour and 6-hour timescales for the first 4 days of ICU stay. Results: Cohort and per-patient median SI levels increased by 34% and 33% (p < 0.001) between days 1 and 2 of ICU stay. Concomitantly, cohort and per-patient SI variability decreased by 32% and 36% (p < 0.001). For 72% of the cohort, median SI on day 2 was higher than on day 1. The day 1-2 results are the only clear, statistically significant trends across both analyses. Analysis of the first 24 hours using 6-hour blocks of SI data showed that most of the improvement in insulin sensitivity level and variability seen between days 1 and 2 occurred during the first 12-18 hours of day 1. Conclusions: Critically ill patients have significantly lower and more variable insulin sensitivity on day 1 than later in their ICU stay and particularly during the first 12 hours. This rapid improvement is likely due to the decline of counter-regulatory hormones as the acute phase of critical illness progresses. Clinically, these results suggest that while using TGC protocols with patients during their first few days of ICU stay, extra care should be afforded. Increased measurement frequency, higher target glycemic bands, conservative insulin dosing, and modulation of carbohydrate nutrition should be considered to minimize safely the outcome glycemic variability and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Variability of insulin sensitivity during the first 4 days of critical illness: implications for tight glycemic control
    Christopher G Pretty
    Aaron J Le Compte
    J Geoffrey Chase
    Geoffrey M Shaw
    Jean-Charles Preiser
    Sophie Penning
    Thomas Desaive
    [J]. Annals of Intensive Care, 2
  • [2] Variability of insulin sensitivity during the first 4 days of critical illness
    C Pretty
    A Le Compte
    JG Chase
    G Shaw
    JC Preiser
    S Penning
    T Desaive
    [J]. Critical Care, 16 (Suppl 1):
  • [3] Enhanced insulin sensitivity variability in the first 3 days of ICU stay: implications for tight glycemic control
    JG Chase
    AJ Le Compte
    S Penning
    KT Moorhead
    P Massion
    JC Preiser
    CG Pretty
    GM Shaw
    T Desaive
    [J]. Critical Care, 15 (Suppl 1):
  • [4] Glycemic control during critical illness
    Preiser, Jean-Charles
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2011, 6 (05) : 681 - 688
  • [5] Tight glycemic control in critical care - The leading role of insulin sensitivity and patient variability: A review and model-based analysis
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    Le Compte, Aaron J.
    Suhaimi, Fatanah
    Shaw, Geoffrey M.
    Lynn, Adrienne
    Lin, Jessica
    Pretty, Christopher G.
    Razak, Normy
    Parente, Jacquelyn D.
    Hann, Christopher E.
    Preiser, Jean-Charles
    Desaive, Thomas
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 102 (02) : 156 - 171
  • [6] The Impact of Insulin Sensitivity Variability and Dynamics on Tight Glycemic Control in Neonatal and Adult Intensive Care
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    Le Compte, Aaron
    Pretty, Christopher G.
    Lynn, Adri-Enne
    Shaw, Geoffrey M.
    Lin, Jessica
    Razak, Normy
    Parente, Jacquelyn
    [J]. DIABETES, 2009, 58 : A161 - A162
  • [7] Glycemic control and insulin therapy in sepsis and critical illness
    Branco, Ricardo Garcia
    Tasker, Robert Charles
    Ramos Garcia, Pedro Celiny
    Piva, Jefferson Pedro
    Xavier, Lisandra Dias
    [J]. JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA, 2007, 83 (05) : S128 - S136
  • [8] A simple insulin-nutrition protocol for tight glycemic control in critical illness: Development and protocol comparison
    Lonergan, Timothy
    Le Compte, Aaron
    Willacy, Mike
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    Shaw, Geoffrey M.
    Wong, Xing-Wei
    Lotz, Thomas
    Lin, Jessica
    Hann, Christopher E.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 8 (02) : 191 - 206
  • [9] The benefits of tight glycemic control in critical illness: Sweeter than assumed?
    Gardner, Andrew John
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 18 (12) : 807 - 813
  • [10] Metabolic Management during Critical Illness: Glycemic Control in the ICU
    Honiden, Shyoko
    Inzucchi, Silvio E.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 36 (06) : 859 - 869