Effect of lengthening rate on angiogenesis during distraction osteogenesis

被引:106
|
作者
Li, G
Simpson, AHRW
Kenwright, J
Triffitt, JT
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Surg, Oxford, England
[2] MRC, Bone Res Lab, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford, England
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jor.1100170310
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigated the angiogenic response to four varying rates (0.3, 0.7, 1.3, and 2.7 mm/day) of distraction in a rabbit model of leg-lengthening. Immunostaining was performed with use of specific antibodies to type-IV collagen and endothelial cell antigen to examine semiquantitatively the presence of blood vessels in the developing tissues. With use of the Chalkley counting method, the greatest number of positive-staining blood vessel cells was found in the central fibrous zone of the groups that underwent lengthening at 0.7 and 1.3 mm/day compared with any other zone in any group(p < 0.05, t test). There were no statistical differences in the positive labeling indices in the mineralization front and the new bane zone adjacent to the mineralization front in any of the groups. However, the decrease in the number of positive-staining blood vessel cells in the new bone zone distant to the mineralization front compared with any other zone in any group was statistically significant. The results suggest that during distraction osteogenesis, the precursor cells of new capillaries were present in abundance within the fibrous interzone. These cells connected into the capillary network at the junction of the mineralization front and the fibrous zone. The angiogenic response was weaker in the more mature regions within the new bone zones. A slow rate of distraction (0.3 mm/day) did not maximally stimulate angiogenesis in the central fibrous zone, whereas high rates (2.7 mm/day) appeared to impair this response. In this model of distraction osteogenesis,the vascularization process in the central fibrous zone was maximally stimulated at distraction rates of 0.7 and 1.3 mm/day.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 367
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Angiogenesis during distraction osteogenesis is affected by distraction rate
    Li, G
    Simpson, AHRW
    Triffitt, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1997, 12 (09) : P6 - P6
  • [2] Lengthening of muscle during distraction osteogenesis
    De Deyne, PG
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (403) : S171 - S177
  • [3] Angiogenesis during distraction osteogenesis
    Fang, TD
    Xia, W
    Nacamuli, RP
    Song, HM
    Fong, KD
    Mathy, JA
    Shi, YY
    Longaker, MT
    [J]. CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 10, 2003, : 395 - 396
  • [4] Angiogenesis during mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Rowe, NM
    Mehrara, BJ
    Luchs, JS
    Dudziak, ME
    Steinbrech, DS
    Illei, PB
    Fernandez, GJ
    Gittes, GK
    Longaker, MT
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1999, 42 (05) : 470 - 475
  • [5] Osteogenesis and angiogenesis during distraction osteosynthesis
    Shevtsov, VI
    Iryanov, YM
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1995, 119 (07) : 741 - 744
  • [6] Angiogenesis and mineralization during distraction osteogenesis
    Choi, IH
    Chung, CY
    Cho, TJ
    Yoo, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 17 (04) : 435 - 447
  • [7] Histomorphometry of distraction osteogenesis during experimental tibial lengthening
    Fink, B
    Pollnau, C
    Vogel, M
    Skripitz, R
    Enderle, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2003, 17 (02) : 113 - 118
  • [8] Muscle Response to Leg Lengthening during Distraction Osteogenesis
    Thorey, Fritz
    Bruenger, Jens
    Windhagen, Henning
    Witte, Frank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2009, 27 (04) : 483 - 488
  • [9] Mandibular Lengthening by Distraction Osteogenesis in the Setting of Osteogenesis Imperfecta
    Black, Jonathan S.
    Denny, Arlen D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (01) : E16 - E18
  • [10] Distraction osteogenesis for tibial lengthening - Reply
    Aldegheri, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (08): : 1195 - 1195