Equal opportunities and school justice. An interpretation of the egalitarian conception of justice in education

This article makes two main arguments. First, egalitarianism in education allows for the suffisantist perspective, which means that the egalitarianism vs. sufficiency debate-at least the one between Brighouse and Swift on the one hand, and Anderson and Satz on the other--is, for the most part, irrelevant. Second, Brighouse and Swift's application of their own theory is excessive in regard to the type of choices they consider to be partial and thus illegitimate for parents to make.