Sensitivity analysis of risk-based conceptual ship design

被引:0
|
作者
Garbatov, Y. [1 ]
Sisci, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Ctr Marine Technol & Ocean Engn CENTEC, Lisbon, Portugal
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The presented work performs a sensitivity analysis of conceptual ship design of a multipurpose vessel employing a risk-based framework for design. The risk-based framework includes conceptual design to define initial dimensions and characteristics of the ship based on the optimization of the required freight rate, stochastic load modelling, progressive collapse accounting for corrosion degradation during the service life, reliability and cost benefit analysis and finally risk management and sensitivity analysis. The impact of three type design modification factors related to ship design modification: length, block coefficient and service speed; structural design modification associated with the re-scantlings of the midship section leading to different stiffness of principal structural components and cost modification factors associated with the labour, steel, equipment and outfit, machinery costs, profit and overheads are analysed here. Several conclusions with respect to the most significant modification factors are derived. It is analysed the effect that ship design variables (L-pp and C-b) and building cost related variables ( cost of a ton of steel, number of crew and more) have over the final estimation of the costs and is taken consideration of the sensitivity of these.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 508
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New initiatives in risk-based ship design
    不详
    [J]. NAVAL ARCHITECT, 2005, : 53 - 53
  • [2] Fundamental concepts of risk-based ship design
    Vassalos, D
    Konovessis, D
    Guarin, L
    [J]. MARITIME TRANSPORTATION AND EXPLOITATION OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCES, VOLS 1 AND 2: VOL 1: VESSELS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORTATION, 2005, : 1637 - 1643
  • [3] RISK-BASED CONCEPTUAL SHIP DESIGN OF A BULK CARRIER ACCOUNTING FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY DESIGN INDEX (EEDI)
    Garbatov, Y.
    Georgiev, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2021, 163 : A51 - A62
  • [4] Risk-based conceptual ship design of a bulk carrier accounting for energy efficiency design index (eedi)
    Garbatov, Y.
    Georgiev, P.
    [J]. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part A: International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2021, 163
  • [5] SAFEDOR - risk-based ship design, operation and regulation
    Christensen, H
    Hensel, W
    de Lucas, AP
    Sames, PC
    Skjong, R
    Strang, T
    Vassalos, D
    [J]. MARITIME TRANSPORTATION AND EXPLOITATION OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCES, VOLS 1 AND 2: VOL 1: VESSELS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORTATION, 2005, : 1503 - 1509
  • [6] SAFEDOR - the implementation of risk-based ship design and approval
    Breinholt, Christian
    Ehrke, Karl-Christian
    Papanikolaou, Apostolos
    Sames, Pierre C.
    Skjong, Rolf
    Strang, Tom
    Vassalos, Dracos
    Witolla, Thomas
    [J]. TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA 2012, 2012, 48 : 753 - 764
  • [7] Development of Bayesian Network Models for Risk-Based Ship Design
    Konovessis, Dimitris
    Cai, Wenkui
    Vassalos, Dracos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND APPLICATION, 2013, 12 (02) : 140 - 151
  • [8] A RISK-BASED FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN OF A LNG FUELED SHIP
    Kim, Hyunpyo
    Nam, Hyunjoon
    Kang, Ga Hyeong
    Kim, Min Joo
    Kim, Sunghee
    Shin, Dongkyu
    Park, Sung-In
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 42ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2023, VOL 2, 2023,
  • [9] A Risk-based Conceptual Design Method for Submarine Rescue Vehicle
    Huang, Xingling
    Huang, Xiangbing
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION III, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 201-202 : 477 - 482
  • [10] Impact scenario models for probabilistic risk-based design for ship-ship collision
    Stahlberg, Kaarle
    Goerlandt, Floris
    Ehlers, Soren
    Kujala, Pentti
    [J]. MARINE STRUCTURES, 2013, 33 : 238 - 264