Exploring participant motivations and expectations in a researcher-stakeholder engagement process: Willamette Water 2100

被引:19
|
作者
Ferguson, Laura [1 ]
Chan, Samuel [2 ]
Santelmann, Mary [1 ]
Tilt, Bryan [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Fisheries & Wildlife, Oregon Sea Grant, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Anthropol, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Broader impacts; Climate change; Expectations; Modeling; Water management; SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; NETWORKING; DECISIONS; SCENARIOS; ECOSYSTEM; COASTAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.014
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Many barriers impede managers and policy makers from incorporating the "best available science" into decision making and problem solving. Researcher-stakeholder engagement in research is one way to help overcome such cultural, institutional, and practical barriers. In the Willamette Water 2100 project (WW2100), scientists and stakeholders studied biophysical and socioeconomic drivers of future water scarcity in the Willamette Basin to identify ways to anticipate and respond to it. This study explores the participation, motivations, and expectations of research team members and stakeholders in the VVW2100 researcher-stakeholder engagement process. Twenty-six semi-structured interviews of key participants and 137 completed online questionnaires illuminate their perceptions of the engagement process. Qualitative and quantitative analyses demonstrate that participants are motivated to attend for social (ex. knowing other participants), knowledge (ex. interest in the topic), and utility (ex. useful management tool) reasons. Nonparametric statistical analyses show that research team members and stakeholders had similar expectations for the roles participants would play but different expectations for the process and resulting model. For instance, all participants expected research team members to interpret model outputs and stakeholders to provide a "boots on the ground" perspective but only researchers expected the process to provide career experience. In most cases, role, model, and process expectations were fulfilled though not always to the degree expected. Understanding the transdisciplinary research process can lead to better collaboration and more effective problem-solving. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 456
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Transdisciplinary Research in Water Sustainability: What's in it for an Engaged Researcher-Stakeholder Community?
    Ferguson, Laura
    Chan, Samuel
    Santelmann, Mary V.
    Tilt, Bryan
    [J]. WATER ALTERNATIVES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON WATER POLITICS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 11 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [2] Facilitating and supporting return to work after breast cancer: researcher-stakeholder partnership in an intervention modeling process
    Fassier, Jean-Baptiste
    Rouat, Sabrina
    Guittard, Laure
    Broc, Guillaume
    Carretier, Julien
    Peron, Julien
    Sarnin, Philippe
    Fervers, Beatrice
    Letrilliart, Laurent
    Lancelot, Lea
    Baka, Selma
    Bouche, Marion Lamort
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH PROMOTION, 2021, 28 (1_SUPPL) : 15 - 23
  • [3] Corporate Motivations for Environmental Sustainable Development: Exploring the Role of Consumers in Stakeholder Engagement
    Haddock-Fraser, Janet Elaine
    Tourelle, Marielle
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 19 (08) : 527 - 542
  • [4] Exploring Stakeholder Engagement Process as the Success Factor for Infrastructure Projects
    Prebanic, Kristijan Robert
    Vukomanovic, Mladen
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (07)
  • [5] Corporate Motivations of Product Recall Strategy: Exploring the Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Stakeholder Engagement
    Chang, Shao-Chi
    Chang, Heng-Yu
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 22 (06) : 393 - 407
  • [6] Stakeholder engagement by an Italian water utility company: Insight from participant observation of dialogism
    Annesi, Nora
    Battaglia, Massimo
    Frey, Marco
    [J]. UTILITIES POLICY, 2021, 72
  • [7] Using researcher and stakeholder perspectives to develop promising practices to improve stakeholder engagement in the solutions-driven research process
    Canfield K.N.
    Mulvaney K.
    Chatelain C.D.
    [J]. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2022, 4 (3) : 189 - 203
  • [8] Stakeholder Engagement for Green Process Innovation: Exploring the Link and Boundary Conditions
    Appiah, Listowel Owusu
    [J]. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2023, 16 (02): : 153 - 163
  • [9] A Comprehensive Process for Stakeholder Identification and Engagement in Addressing Wicked Water Resources Problems
    Hargrove, William L.
    Heyman, Josiah M.
    [J]. LAND, 2020, 9 (04)
  • [10] Stakeholder Engagement Process in Water Saving Initiatives for Sustainable Tourist Destination in Samui Island, Thailand
    Pongponrat, Kannapa
    [J]. PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2022, 30 (03): : 1341 - 1363