An empirical comparison of insider trading enforcement in Canada and the United States

被引:5
|
作者
Anand, Anita [2 ]
Choi, Stephen J. [4 ]
Pritchard, A. C. [1 ]
Puri, Poonam [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Law, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] York Univ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] NYU, New York, NY USA
关键词
Insider trading; SECURITIES CLASS-ACTIONS; LITIGATION; SETTLEMENTS; SEC;
D O I
10.1016/j.irle.2018.10.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Canadian and American securities market regulators have differing approaches to enforcement. In this article, we present the results of an empirical study comparing a highly salient aspect of securities enforcement-insider trading in Canada and the United States. We reach a number of important findings. First, adjusting for trading volume, Canada has a greater intensity of enforcement when compared to the U.S. Second, Canadian securities regulators primarily concern themselves with insider trading in Canadian companies, while the SEC brings more enforcement actions involving insider trading in companies incorporated outside the U.S. Third, we do not find significant differences in the fraction of actions involving multiple traded companies between Canada and the U.S. However, we do see that U.S. investigations involve a significantly greater number of defendants and that the SEC is more than twice as likely to pursue tippers or tippees (although we observe no significant difference in the likelihood that top insiders will be pursued). Fourth, we find that U.S. cases are significantly more likely to result in a criminal referral leading to prosecution. Fifth, we find that settlements are more likely in the U.S. Finally, in terms of monetary penalties, we find no significant difference between the two countries. However, we do find that Canada is more likely to apply a bar as a sanction, but if a bar is applied, the U.S. is more likely to make the bar permanent. These findings neither demonstrate a need for systemic reform in either jurisdiction nor suggest that centralized regulation is more effective from an enforcement perspective. But, they do provide insight into the differing points of regulatory emphasis in two jurisdictions. From a comparative perspective, our research invites securities regulators to evaluate whether their enforcement approach is optimal on the basis of quantitative data. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 59
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Administrative Enforcement of Insider Trading in China: An Empirical Study
    Yang, Zhang
    Godwin, Andrew
    [J]. COMPANY AND SECURITIES LAW JOURNAL, 2022, 39 (02): : 110 - 137
  • [2] Enforcement of Chinese Insider Trading Law: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective
    Huang, Robin Hui
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 2020, 68 (03): : 517 - 575
  • [3] The extent and intensity of insider trading enforcement - an international comparison
    Bromberg, Lev
    Gilligan, George
    Ramsay, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE LAW STUDIES, 2017, 17 (01) : 73 - 110
  • [4] Insider trading enforcement in Australia
    Lei, Victor
    Ramsay, Ian
    [J]. LAW AND FINANCIAL MARKETS REVIEW, 2014, 8 (03): : 214 - 226
  • [5] BANKING SECRECY AND INSIDER TRADING - THE UNITED-STATES-SWISS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON INSIDER TRADING
    FUGATE, EF
    [J]. VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 1983, 23 (04): : 605 - 634
  • [6] Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States
    Armour, John
    Black, Bernard
    Cheffins, Brian
    Nolan, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2009, 6 (04) : 687 - 722
  • [7] The optimal enforcement of insider trading regulations
    DeMarzo, PM
    Fishman, MJ
    Hagerty, KM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (03) : 602 - 632
  • [8] Insider Trading Enforcement & Link Prediction
    Van Osselaer, Andrew P.
    [J]. TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 2017, 96 (02) : 399 - 424
  • [9] The optimal enforcement of insider trading regulations
    DeMarzo, PM
    Fishman, MJ
    Hagerty, KM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 1996, 5 (02) : 219 - 219
  • [10] The Challenges of Detection and Enforcement of Insider Trading
    Brian J. Adams
    Tod Perry
    Colin Mahoney
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 153 : 375 - 388