Comparison of Once- Versus Twice-Daily Administration of Insulin Detemir, Used With Mealtime Insulin Aspart, in Basal-Bolus Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes Assessment of Detemir Administration in a Progressive Treat-To-Target Trial (ADAPT)

被引:38
|
作者
Le Floch, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Levy, Marc [2 ]
Mosnier-Pudar, Helen [3 ]
Nobels, Frank [4 ]
Laroche, Sylvie [5 ]
Gonbert, Sophie [5 ]
Eschwege, Eveline [6 ]
Fontaine, Pierre [7 ]
机构
[1] Med Clin, Villecresnes, France
[2] Max Fourestier Hosp, Nanterre, France
[3] Cochin Hosp, Paris, France
[4] OL Vrouwziekenhuis Hosp, Aaslt, Belgium
[5] Novo Nordisk Pharmaceut, Paris, France
[6] INSERM, U780, Villejuif, France
[7] Clin Marc Linquette, Lille, France
关键词
NPH INSULIN; DOSE-RESPONSE; GLARGINE; VARIABILITY; PEOPLE; INJECTION; EFFICACY; ANALOG;
D O I
10.2337/dc08-0332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - The purpose Of this Study was to compare effects of insulin detemir once daily versus twice a day in a basal-bolus insulin regimen. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - In this open-label, 7-month Study 520, I patients with type I diabetes were randomly assigned to receive detemir once daily or twice daily with mealtime insulin aspart. Insulin doses were titrated over I month, with patients followed up over the subsequent 3 months. Thereafter, patients were able to switch from one regimen to the other, with an additional nonrandomized 3-month follow-up, to a total of 7 months. The primary end point was A1C at 4 months, with noninferiority defined as a difference <0.4% between groups. RESULTS - A1C at 4 months was 8.1 +/- 0.9 versus 8.0 +/- 1.0% with once- and twice-daily detemir, respectively, with an adjusted between-group difference of 0.12% (95% Cl-0.01 to 0.25%), showing noninferiority for once-daily dosing. Similar results were found in the per protocol population. Improvement in A1C was similar in both groups (-0.4 +/- 0.8 vs. -0.5 +/- 0.8%; P = 0.09, NS) but with differences in the 7-point glucose profile. Detemir doses were lower (29 +/- 18 vs. 39 +/- 20 units/day, P < 0.001), but aspart doses were higher (34 +/- 17 vs. 26 +/- 14 IU/day, P < 0.001) with once-daily detemir. At 7 months, A1C decreased slightly in patients switched from once-daily to twice-daily administration (8.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 8.0 +/- 0.8%; P = 0.34, NS) in association with increased total insulin doses (P < 0.05), but A1C increased in those switched from twice-daily to once-daily administration (7.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.6 +/- 0.8%, P < 0.05) in association with decreased doses (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS - Although some individuals may benefit from twice-daily closing, the most suitable routine starting schedule for detemir in a basal-bolus regimen for type 1 diabetes is once-daily injection.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 37
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The PREFER study: a comparison of outcomes in patients using insulin detemir once daily or twice daily in a basal bolus regimen with mealtime insulin aspart
    Garber, A.
    Binz, K.
    Bergenstal, R.
    Liebl, A.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 : 610 - 610
  • [2] Metabolic control by insulin detemir in basal-bolus therapy: treat-to-target study in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
    Nimri, Revital
    Lebenthal, Yael
    Shalitin, Shlomit
    Benzaquen, Hadasa
    Demol, Sharon
    Phillip, Moshe
    [J]. PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2013, 14 (03) : 196 - 202
  • [3] Comparison of Insulin Detemir and Insulin Glargine in a Basal-Bolus Regimen, With Insulin Aspart as the Mealtime Insulin, in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A 52-Week, Multinational, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Treat-to-Target Noninferiority Trial
    Heller, Simon
    Koenen, Christoph
    Bode, Bruce
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 31 (10) : 2086 - 2097
  • [4] Comparison of Once-daily versus Twice-daily Injection of Insulin Detemir in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
    Setoodeh, Aria
    Rabbani, Ali
    Sayarifard, Fatemeh
    Haghshenas, Zahra
    Sayarifard, Azadeh
    Rostami, Parastoo
    Abbasi, Farzaneh
    Bayat, Mohadeseh
    Amini, Sima
    Tavakolizadeh, Reza
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 32 (06)
  • [5] Comparison of insulin lispro protamine suspension and insulin detemir in basal-bolus therapy in patients with Type 1 diabetes
    Chacra, A. R.
    Kipnes, M.
    Ilag, L. L.
    Sarwat, S.
    Giaconia, J.
    Chan, J.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (05) : 563 - 569
  • [6] Comparison of insulin degludec with insulin detemir in type 1 diabetes: a 1-year treat-to-target trial
    Davies, M.
    Sasaki, T.
    Gross, J. L.
    Bantwal, G.
    Ono, Y.
    Nishida, T.
    Tojjar, D.
    Seino, H.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2016, 18 (01): : 96 - 99
  • [7] A 52-Week, Multinational, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Noninferiority, Treat-to-Target Trial Comparing Insulin Detemir with Insulin Glargine in a Basal-Bolus Regimen with Mealtime Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Hollander, Priscilla
    Cooper, John
    Bregnhoj, Jesper
    Pedersen, Claus Bang
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 30 (11) : 1976 - 1987
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis of basal-bolus therapy of type 1 diabetes using insulin detemir plus insulin aspart versus NPH plus insulin aspart regimens
    Valentine, WJ
    Wittrup-Jensen, KU
    Häuser, C
    Roze, S
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 : A334 - A334
  • [9] A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of basal-bolus therapy of Type 1 diabetes using insulin detemir plus insulin aspart versus human insulin-based regimens
    Palmer, AJ
    Roze, S
    Valentine, WJ
    Smith, IC
    Wittrup-Jensen, K
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2004, 47 : A344 - A344
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness analysis of basal-bolus therapy of type 1 diabetes using insulin detemir plus insulin aspart versus NPH plus insulin aspart regimens
    Valentine, WJ
    Wittrup-Jensen, KU
    Palmer, AJ
    Roze, S
    [J]. DIABETES, 2005, 54 : A609 - A609