Charcoal power: The political violence of non-fossil fuel in Uganda

被引:18
|
作者
Branch, Adam [1 ]
Martiniello, Giuliano [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Charcoal; Uganda; Africa; Woodfuels; Energy politics; Conflict; Extractivism; ENERGY; INSTITUTIONS; LIVELIHOODS; PROFITS; POVERTY; ECONOMY; ACCESS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.012
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The politics of global energy are subject to increasing academic interest. Most work on energy politics focuses on oil, based upon a normative vision of a global energy modernity of fossil fuels and a transition to renewables. In many African countries, however, the most prevalent source of energy is not oil, but woodfuel. Charcoal is of particular importance due to its centrality to urbanization: charcoal is the primary household energy source for up to 80% of urban Africa, and its consumption is expected to continue increasing with expanding urbanization. Despite this centrality, the politics of charcoal remain largely unexplored. This article asks how political power shapes charcoal production and how charcoal as an energy source shapes political power through an in-depth study of charcoal extraction in northern Uganda. It argues that charcoal production, and its particular destructiveness, should be understood as a continuation of the violence of the 1986-2006 war between the Lord's Resistance Army and the Ugandan government. Based on long-term fieldwork in northern Uganda, the article draws a distinction between the politics of small-scale household production and of large-scale industrial production. By focusing on the political violence of industrial charcoal production, we argue that orthodox academic and policy narratives about the charcoal industry in Africa can be qualified, and new questions can be raised concerning broader narratives of energy modernity and global energy politics.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 252
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] BIOMASS AS A NON-FOSSIL FUEL SOURCE - AN OVERVIEW
    BHATIA, VK
    [J]. RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY, 1988, 33 (02): : 154 - 161
  • [3] Economic instruments and the prospects for non-fossil fuel energy
    Ash, EA
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2001, 26 (04) : 258 - 264
  • [4] Non-fossil fuel development scenarios based on the EPPAC model
    Liu, Jia
    Duan, Maosheng
    Zhang, Jianyu
    Yang, Fan
    [J]. Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2013, 53 (09): : 1294 - 1299
  • [5] Important contributions of non-fossil fuel nitrogen oxides emissions
    Wei Song
    Xue-Yan Liu
    Chao-Chen Hu
    Guan-Yi Chen
    Xue-Jun Liu
    Wendell W. Walters
    Greg Michalski
    Cong-Qiang Liu
    [J]. Nature Communications, 12
  • [6] Important contributions of non-fossil fuel nitrogen oxides emissions
    Song, Wei
    Liu, Xue-Yan
    Hu, Chao-Chen
    Chen, Guan-Yi
    Liu, Xue-Jun
    Walters, Wendell W.
    Michalski, Greg
    Liu, Cong-Qiang
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [7] Gas rig operator opts for non-fossil power
    Sharpe, L
    [J]. IEE REVIEW, 2005, 51 (11): : 17 - 17
  • [8] Utilization of the non-fossil fuel target and its implications in China
    Zhang, Shuwei
    Bauer, Nico
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2013, 13 (03) : 328 - 344
  • [9] The England and Wales non-fossil fuel obligation: History and lessons
    Mitchell, C
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 25 : 285 - 312
  • [10] Extremely Insulated Greenhouse Concept with Non-Fossil Fuel Heating System
    Meyer, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH TECHNOLOGY FOR GREENHOUSE SYSTEMS: GREENSYS2009, 2011, (893): : 201 - 208