The coping strategies questionnaire: A large sample, item level factor analysis

被引:186
|
作者
Robinson, ME
Riley, JL
Myers, CD
Sadler, IJ
Kvaal, SA
Geisser, ME
Keefe, FJ
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT PHYS MED & REHABIL,PAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[2] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DURHAM,NC
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN | 1997年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
coping strategies questionnaire; factor analysis; chronic pain;
D O I
10.1097/00002508-199703000-00007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), a measure of coping in chronic pain patients, was subjected to item-level exploratory factor analysis. Subjects: A sample of 965 chronic pain patients were used in the analysis. Results: Principal components analysis using a varimax rotation procedure identified nine factors that accounted for 54.5% of the variance. Of these nine factors, the first five represent subscales of the original CSQ subscales. The catastrophizing subscale replicated with significant loadings for all six original items, and ignoring sensations replicated with five of six items. Factors representing reinterpreting pain sensations, coping self-statements, and diverting attention subscales also appeared. The items from the praying and hoping subscale split into separate praying and hoping factors (factors 6 and 8). When reliability coefficients were calculated, factors 7 through 9 had unacceptably low internal consistency and thus were not considered stable factors. Correlations between factors 1 through 6 and other measures of psychological and physical functioning were calculated in the construct validation portion of this study. Previously found relationships were replicated in that the correlations between CSQ factor scores and measures of pain, depression, and disability were in the same direction in this data set as those previously reported.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE COPING STRATEGIES QUESTIONNAIRE
    SWARTZMAN, LC
    GWADRY, FG
    SHAPIRO, AP
    TEASELL, RW
    [J]. PAIN, 1994, 57 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [2] Item-level endorsement on the Prodromal Questionnaire in a large non-clinical sample
    Capizzi, Riley
    Pierce, Katherine M.
    Olino, Thomas M.
    Ellman, Lauren M.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2022, 248 : 309 - 319
  • [3] Ethnic differences in pain coping: Factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire and Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Revised
    Hastie, BA
    Riley, JL
    Fillingim, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2004, 5 (06): : 304 - 316
  • [4] Measurement Structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire-24 in a Sample of Individuals With Musculoskeletal Pain: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
    Chiu, Chung-Yi
    Jochman, Joseph
    Fujikawa, Mayu
    Strand, David
    Cheing, Gladys
    Lee, Gloria
    Chan, Fong
    [J]. REHABILITATION RESEARCH POLICY AND EDUCATION, 2014, 28 (02): : 80 - 90
  • [5] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Revised for Veterans With Pain
    Freed, Rachel D.
    Emmert-Aronson, Benjamin O.
    Alschuler, Kevin N.
    Otis, John D.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2019, 16 (04) : 535 - 542
  • [6] The 27-item Coping Strategies Questionnaire - Revised: Confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity in Italian-speaking subjects with chronic pain
    Monticone, Marco
    Ferrante, Simona
    Giorgi, Ines
    Galandra, Caterina
    Rocca, Barbara
    Foti, Calogero
    [J]. PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 19 (03): : 153 - 158
  • [7] A new questionnaire assessing coping strategies in relatives of patients with schizophrenia: Development and factor analysis
    Magliano, L
    Guarneri, M
    Marasco, C
    Tosini, P
    Morosini, PL
    Maj, M
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 94 (04) : 224 - 228
  • [8] An exploratory factor analysis of the procedural coping questionnaire
    Bento, Samantha
    Gaultney, Wendy
    Dahlquist, Lynnda
    [J]. CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE, 2020, 49 (01) : 55 - 68
  • [9] Reliability and validity of the situational confidence questionnaire in an adolescent sample: Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory
    Kirisci, L
    Moss, HB
    [J]. MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 30 (03) : 146 - 155
  • [10] Development of the coping strategies questionnaire 24, a clinically utilitarian version of the coping strategies questionnaire
    Harland, NJ
    Georgieff, K
    [J]. REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 48 (04) : 296 - 300