Legal origin, juridical form and industrialization in historical perspective: the case of the employment contract and the joint-stock company

被引:27
|
作者
Deakin, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, CBR, Cambridge, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
varieties of capitalism; financial markets; industrial relations; institutional complementarity; labour law; labour market institutions; corporate governance; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; COMMON-LAW; LABOR-LAW; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1093/ser/mwn019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The timing and nature of industrialization in Britain and continental Europe had significant consequences for the growth and development of labour market institutions, effects which are still felt today and which are visible in the conceptual structure of labour law and company law in different countries. However, contrary to the claims of the legal origin hypothesis, a liberal model of contract was more influential in the civilian systems of the continent than in the English common law, where the consequences of early industrialization included the lingering influence of master-servant legislation and the weak institutionalization of the juridical form of the contract of employment. Claims for a strong-form legal origin effect, which is time invariant and resistant to pressures for legal convergence, are not borne out by a growing body of historical evidence and time-series data. The idea that legal cultures can influence the long-run path of economic development is worthy of closer empirical investigation, but it is premature to use legal origin theory as a basis for policy initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 65
页数:31
相关论文
共 8 条