Commentary: ADHD and social disadvantage: an inconvenient truth? - a reflection on Russell et al. (2014) and Larsson et al. (2014)

被引:6
|
作者
Nigg, Joel T. [1 ]
Craver, Lindsay [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Psychiat, Portland, OR 97219 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, Dept Psychol, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
social disadvantage; ADHD; epigtenetics; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/jcpp.12237
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
In the 1950's, many experts believed hyperkinesis was a neurotic reaction to inner conflicts arising from early family experiences. In the 1990's, many experts believed ADHD to be 'genetic' (without a mechanistic explanation of what that meant). Both views appear naive today in a scientific world grappling with the complexity of highly plastic gene expression, gene x environment interplay, and epigenetic, context-dependent emergence of psychopathology. Both views also fail to account for the uncomfortable fact that ADHD is also associated with social disadvantage - a level of analysis required in a developmental psychopathology approach. That developmental psychopathology approach, pioneered a generation ago, initially emphasized the accumulation of risk and protective factors, and emerged in a contemporary systemic approach that seeks to determine whether it is risk accumulation (e.g., allostatic load) or specific risk factors (e.g., family process) that mechanistically shape psychopathology. Despite the prominence of the developmental psychopathology perspective, the social context of ADHD is surprisingly neglected today. Both Russell etal. (this issue, 2014) and Larsson etal. (this issue, 2014) take strides toward remedying this state of affairs.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 447
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commentary: Attachment is a biological concept - a reflection on Fearon et al. (2014)
    Rutter, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 55 (09) : 1042 - 1043
  • [2] Metacognition as Discrimination: Commentary on Smith et al. (2014)
    Basile, Benjamin M.
    Hampton, Robert R.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 128 (02) : 135 - 137
  • [3] Commentary: Response to commentary by Rutter on Munafo et al. (2014)
    Munafo, Marcus R.
    Zammit, Stanley
    Flint, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 55 (10) : 1105 - 1106
  • [4] Revisiting Cohen et al. 2015, Cohen et al. 2014 and Waalkes et al. 2014: a bayesian re-analysis of tumor incidences
    Ingrid L. Druwe
    Lyle Burgoon
    Archives of Toxicology, 2016, 90 : 2047 - 2048
  • [5] Revisiting Cohen et al. 2015, Cohen et al. 2014 and Waalkes et al. 2014: a bayesian re-analysis of tumor incidences
    Druwe, Ingrid L.
    Burgoon, Lyle
    ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 90 (08) : 2047 - 2048
  • [6] Commentary on Sertkaya et al. and Larson et al.
    Eisenstein, Eric L.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (02) : 137 - 139
  • [7] Comment on Dieter et al. (2014)
    Askham, Leonard R.
    Godfrey, Michael E. R.
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2014, 8 (02): : 291 - 292
  • [8] A Rejoinder to Rigdon et al. (2014)
    Aguirre-Urreta, Miguel I.
    Marakas, George M.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (04) : 785 - 788
  • [9] Correction for Hickerson et al. ( 2014)
    Hickerson, Michael J.
    EVOLUTION, 2014, 68 (05) : 1552 - 1552
  • [10] Corrigendum to Hussey et al. ( 2014)
    Hussey, Nigel E.
    MacNeil, M. Aaron
    McMeans, Bailey C.
    Olin, Jill A.
    Dudley, Sheldon F. J.
    Cliff, Geremy
    Wintner, Sabine P.
    Fennessy, Sean T.
    Fisk, Aaron T.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 17 (06) : 768 - 768