A review of riverine ecosystem service quantification: Research gaps and recommendations

被引:85
|
作者
Hanna, Dalal E. L. [1 ]
Tomscha, Stephanie A. [2 ]
Dallaire, Camille Ouellet [3 ]
Bennett, Elena M. [4 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest & Conservat Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Geog, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Sch Environm, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
aquatic; ecosystem management; ecosystem service; human impact; land use; research challenges; river; river management; riverine; sustainability; FRESH-WATER; TRADE-OFFS; DEMAND; FLOW; STAKEHOLDERS; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS; SCALE; RESTORATION; LANDSCAPES;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13045
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Increasing demand for benefits provided by riverine ecosystems threatens their sustainable provision. The ecosystem service concept is a promising avenue to inform riverine ecosystem management, but several challenges have prevented the application of this concept. 2. We quantitatively assess the field of riverine ecosystem services' progress in meeting these challenges. We highlight conceptual and methodological gaps, which have impeded integration of the ecosystem service concept into management. 3. Across 89 relevant studies, 33 unique riverine ecosystem services were evaluated, for a total of 404 ecosystem service quantifications. Studies quantified between 1 and 23 ecosystem services, although the majority (55%) evaluated three or less. Among studies that quantified more than one service, 58% assessed interactions between services. Most studies (71%) did not include stakeholders in their quantification protocols, and 34% developed future scenarios of ecosystem service provision. Almost half (45%) conducted monetary valuation, using 16 methods. Only 9% did not quantify or discuss uncertainties associated with service quantification. The indicators and methods used to quantify the same type of ecosystem service varied. Only 3% of services used indicators of capacity, flow and demand in concert. 4. Our results suggest indicators, data sources and methods for quantifying riverine ecosystem services should be more clearly defined and accurately represent the service they intend to quantify. Furthermore, more assessments of multiple services across diverse spatial extents and of riverine service interactions are needed, with better inclusion of stakeholders. Addressing these challenges will help riverine ecosystem service science inform river management. 5. Synthesis and applications. The ecosystem service concept has great potential to inform riverine ecosystem management and decision-making processes. However, this review of riverine ecosystem service quantification uncovers several remaining research gaps, impeding effective use of this tool to manage riverine ecosystems. We highlight these gaps and point to studies showcasing methods that can be used to address them.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1311
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of machine learning and big data applications in addressing ecosystem service research gaps
    Manley, Kyle
    Nyelele, Charity
    Egoh, Benis N.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 57
  • [2] A review of tropical dry forest ecosystem service research in the Caribbean - gaps and policy-implications
    Nelson, H. P.
    Devenish-Nelson, E. S.
    Rusk, B. L.
    Geary, M.
    Lawrence, A. J.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 43
  • [3] A Scientometrics Review on Land Ecosystem Service Research
    Xie, Hualin
    Zhang, Yanwei
    Choi, Yongrok
    Li, Fengqin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [4] Linking Landscape Connectivity and Ecosystem Service Provision: Current Knowledge and Research Gaps
    Mitchell, Matthew G. E.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2013, 16 (05) : 894 - 908
  • [5] Linking Landscape Connectivity and Ecosystem Service Provision: Current Knowledge and Research Gaps
    Matthew G. E. Mitchell
    Elena M. Bennett
    Andrew Gonzalez
    [J]. Ecosystems, 2013, 16 : 894 - 908
  • [6] Identifying gaps in protected areas to expand integrated riverine ecosystem conservation
    Major, James
    Perry, Denielle
    Aslan, Clare
    McManamay, Ryan
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 3 (08)
  • [7] Temporal patterns in ecosystem services research: A review and three recommendations
    Rau, Anna-Lena
    Burkhardt, Verena
    Dorninger, Christian
    Hjort, Cecilia
    Ibe, Karin
    Kessler, Lisa
    Kristensen, Jeppe A.
    McRobert, Andrew
    Sidemo-Holm, William
    Zimmermann, Heike
    Abson, David J.
    von Wehrden, Henrik
    Ekroos, Johan
    [J]. AMBIO, 2020, 49 (08) : 1377 - 1393
  • [8] Temporal patterns in ecosystem services research: A review and three recommendations
    Anna-Lena Rau
    Verena Burkhardt
    Christian Dorninger
    Cecilia Hjort
    Karin Ibe
    Lisa Keßler
    Jeppe A. Kristensen
    Andrew McRobert
    William Sidemo-Holm
    Heike Zimmermann
    David J. Abson
    Henrik von Wehrden
    Johan Ekroos
    [J]. Ambio, 2020, 49 : 1377 - 1393
  • [9] Pregnancy and oral health - A review and recommendations to reduce gaps in practice and research
    Russell, Stefanie L.
    Mayberry, Linda J.
    [J]. MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2008, 33 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [10] Synthesizing multiple ecosystem service assessments for urban planning: A review of approaches, and recommendations
    Cortinovis, Chiara
    Geneletti, Davide
    Hedlund, Katarina
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2021, 213