Systematic reviews of surgical interventions

被引:5
|
作者
Burton, M [1 ]
Clarke, M
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Radcliffe Infirm, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Oxford OX2 6HE, England
[2] UK Cochrane Ctr, Oxford OX2 7LG, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
All physicians are familiar with the type of general review articles found in many medical journals. Systematic reviews are different. They apply a strict, scientific methodology to the reviewing process to produce a review that is comprehensive, reliable, and as free from bias as possible. As a result, systematic reviews occupy the highest position in the "levels of evidence" tables associated with the practice of evidence-based health care. Systematic reviews relevant to surgery are no less relevant than systematic reviews in other areas of health care. They should be a prerequisite of any new research, a key component in decision making, and an opportunity for all surgical practitioners to get involved in the conduct and interpretation of research.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical interventions for gastric cancer: a review of systematic reviews
    He, Weiling
    Tu, Jian
    Huo, Zijun
    Li, Yuhuang
    Peng, Jintao
    Qiu, Zhenwen
    Luo, Dandong
    Ke, Zunfu
    Chen, Xinlin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (08): : 13657 - 13669
  • [2] The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews
    Jacobs, Wilco C. H.
    Rubinstein, Sidney M.
    Willems, Paul C.
    Moojen, Wouter A.
    Pellise, Ferran
    Oner, Cumhur F.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (09) : 1936 - 1949
  • [3] The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews
    Wilco C. H. Jacobs
    Sidney M. Rubinstein
    Paul C. Willems
    Wouter A. Moojen
    Ferran Pellisé
    Cumhur F. Oner
    Wilco C. Peul
    Maurits W. van Tulder
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 1936 - 1949
  • [4] Systematic reviews of optometric interventions
    Elliott, David B.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2012, 32 (03) : 173 - 173
  • [5] Systematic reviews on rehabilitation interventions
    Handoll, HH
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (06): : 875 - 875
  • [6] Non-Surgical Interventions for Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Plaszewski, Maciej
    Bettany-Saltikov, Josette
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [7] Salutogenically focused outcomes in systematic reviews of intrapartum interventions: A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Smith, Valerie
    Daly, Deirdre
    Lundgren, Ingela
    Eri, Tine
    Benstoem, Carina
    Devane, Declan
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (04) : E151 - E156
  • [8] Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Nasser, Mona
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 110 (06) : 753 - 754
  • [9] Analysis of quality of interventions in systematic reviews
    Herbert, RD
    Bo, K
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7515): : 507 - 509
  • [10] The Impact of mHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Marcolino, Milena Soriano
    Queiroz Oliveira, Joao Antonio
    D'Agostino, Marcelo
    Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz
    Moreira Alkmim, Maria Beatriz
    Novillo-Ortiz, David
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (01):