Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-associated pancreatitis? A randomized, prospective study

被引:69
|
作者
Cha, Sang-Woo [1 ]
Leung, Wesley D. [1 ]
Lehman, Glen A. [1 ]
Watkins, James L. [1 ]
McHenry, Lee [1 ]
Fogel, Evan L. [1 ]
Sherman, Stuart [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
POST-ERCP PANCREATITIS; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; NEEDLE-KNIFE PAPILLOTOMY; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; COMMON BILE-DUCT; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; COMPLICATIONS; CANNULATION; TRIAL; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.022
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pancreatitis is the most common major complication of ERCP and precut endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Prophylactic pancreatic duct (PD) stent placement has been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk settings. Objective: To determine whether leaving a main PD stent in place after precut ES would reduce the incidence and severity of PEP. Design: Single-center, randomized, prospective study. Setting: Tertiary care ERCP referral center. Patients: Consecutive patients who underwent ERCP with a clear indication for biliary access and standard biliary ES whereby free cannulation of the bile duct was not possible and precut ES was undertaken. Interventions: When free bile duct cannulation for ES was not possible and selective PD cannulation was achieved, a PD stent was placed. Using the PD stent as a guide, we used a needle-knife sphincterotome to perform precut ES. The patients were then randomized to either leaving the PD stent in place for 7 to 10 days (stent group) or immediate removal after the procedure (stent removed group). The remaining patients who did not undergo selective PD cannulation and stent placement were not randomized (no stent group) and had a free-hand needle-knife ES performed. Main Outcome Measurements: Patients were prospectively followed for the development of complications. Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and grade the severity of PEP. Results: A total of 151 patients were enrolled. The groups were similar with regard to patient demographics and patient and procedure risk factors for PEP. The overall incidence of PEP was 13.2% (20/151). It occurred in 4.3% (2/46), 21.3% (10/47), and 13.8% (8/58) of patients in the stent, stent removed, and no stent groups, respectively. The stent group had a significantly lower frequency and severity of PEP compared with the stent removed group (4.3% vs 21.3%; P = .027 for frequency and 0% vs 12.8%; P = .026 for moderate and severe pancreatitis). Limitations: Single center. Randomization scheme not optimal. Conclusions: These data suggest that placing and maintaining a PD stent for needle-knife precut ES reduces the frequency and severity of postprocedure pancreatitis. (Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 209-16.)
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] DOES LEAVING A MAIN PANCREATIC DUCT STENT IN-PLACE REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF PRECUT BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY (ES)-INDUCED PANCREATITIS
    SHERMAN, S
    EARLE, D
    BUCKSOT, L
    WEBER, C
    GOTTLIEB, K
    LEHMAN, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (04) : 428 - 428
  • [2] Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy (ES)-induced pancreatitis? A final analysis of a randomized prospective study.
    Sherman, S
    Earle, D
    Bucksot, L
    Baute, P
    Gottlieb, K
    Lehman, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (04) : 489 - 489
  • [3] Precut Over a Pancreatic Duct Stent Versus Transpancreatic Precut Sphincterotomy for Difficult Biliary Cannulation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Qi, Yang
    Li, Qianyi
    Yao, Wenfei
    Wu, Yuquan
    Li, Nengping
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2024,
  • [4] Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study
    Fazel, A
    Quadri, A
    Catalano, MF
    Meyerson, SM
    Geenen, JE
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (03) : 291 - 294
  • [5] Difficult Biliary Cannulation: Use of Physician Controlled Wire-Guided Cannulation Over a Pancreatic Duct Stent to Reduce the Rate of Precut Sphincterotomy
    Ansstas, Michael
    Pawa, Rishi
    Cote, Gregory A.
    Shah, Somal
    Pleskow, Douglas K.
    Azar, Riad R.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB155 - AB155
  • [6] Difficult biliary cannulation: use of physician-controlled wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic duct stent to reduce the rate of precut sphincterotomy (with video)
    Cote, Gregory A.
    Ansstas, Michael
    Pawa, Rishi
    Edmundowicz, Steven A.
    Jonnalagadda, Sreenivasa S.
    Pleskow, Douglas K.
    Azar, Riad R.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (02) : 275 - 279
  • [7] EFFECT OF PROPHYLACTIC MAIN PANCREATIC DUCT STENTING ON THE INCIDENCE OF BILIARY ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY-INDUCED PANCREATITIS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS
    SMITHLINE, A
    SILVERMAN, W
    ROGERS, D
    NISI, R
    WIERSEMA, M
    JAMIDAR, P
    HAWES, R
    LEHMAN, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 39 (05) : 652 - 657
  • [8] The Safety and Efficacy of an Unflanged 4F Pancreatic Stent in Transpancreatic Precut Sphincterotomy for Patients with Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Ryu, Jieun
    Paik, Kyu-Hyun
    Chang-Il Kwon
    Koh, Dong Hee
    Song, Tae Jun
    Jeong, Seok
    Park, Won Suk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [9] Does stenting after pancreatic sphincterotomy reduce post-ERCP pancratitis in patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy?: Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial
    Patel, R
    Tarnasky, PR
    Hennessy, WS
    Hawes, RH
    Payne, KM
    Nelles, SE
    Cunningham, JT
    Cotton, PB
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (04) : AB80 - AB80
  • [10] Does placement of a small diameter, long length, unflanged pancreatic duct stent reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis?
    Fogel, EL
    Devereaux, BM
    Rerknimitr, R
    Sherman, S
    Bucksot, L
    Lehman, GA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB182 - AB182