Forfeiture law, the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause, and United States v. Bajakajian

被引：0

|

作者：

Rolland, MA

机构：

来源：

NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW | 1999年 / 74卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：1371 / 1401

页数：31

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] Purging the cruel and unusual:: The autonomous excessive fines clause and desert-based constitutional limits on forfeiture after United States v. Bajakajian
Johnson, BL
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 2000, (02): : 461 - 515
[2] Sixth Amendment - Confrontation Clause - Samia v. United States
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2023, 137 (01) : 320 - 329
[3] Fifth Amendment - Double Jeopardy Clause - Tribal Sovereignty - Denezpi v. United States
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2022, 136 (01) : 350 - 359
[4] Fifth Amendment - Double Jeopardy Clause - Separate Sovereigns Doctrine - Gamble v. United States
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2019, 133 (01) : 312 - 321
[5] A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING WHETHER CIVIL PENALTIES UNDER THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT VIOLATE THE EXCESSIVE FINES CLAUSE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT
Hesch, Joel D.
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 2023, 91 (04) : 1012 - 1038
[6] Eighth Amendment - Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause - Method of Execution Challenges - Bucklew v. Precythe
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2019, 133 (01) : 332 - 341
[7] Fixing the fourth amendment with trade secret law:: A response to Kyllo v. United States
Dunlap, AR
[J]. GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL, 2002, 90 (06) : 2175 - 2205
[8] International law v. United States
McCarthy, AC
[J]. COMMENTARY, 2006, 121 (02) : 41 - 48
[9] The perils of minimalism: United States v. Bajakajian in the wake of the Supreme Court's civil double jeopardy excursion
Solomon, MC
[J]. GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL, 1999, 87 (03) : 849 - 885
[10] Contracting the thirteenth amendment: Hodges v. United States
Karlan, PS
[J]. BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2005, 85 (03) : 783 - 809

← 1 2 3 4 5 →