Adaptation can help mitigation: an integrated approach to post-2012 climate policy

被引:17
|
作者
Bosello, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Carraro, Carlo [2 ,3 ]
De Cian, Enrica [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, FEEM, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] CMCC, I-30124 Venice, Italy
[3] Univ Venice, CEPR, CESifo, FEEM, I-30123 Venice, Italy
[4] Univ Ca Foscari Venice, Fdn ENI Enrico Mattei, I-30124 Venice, Italy
关键词
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; ECONOMICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1017/S1355770X13000132
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the optimal mix of adaptation and mitigation expenditures in a cost-effective setting, in which countries cooperate to achieve a long-term stabilization target (550 CO2-eq). It uses an Integrated Assessment Model (AD-WITCH) that describes the relationships between different adaptation modes (reactive and anticipatory), mitigation and capacity building to analyze the optimal portfolio of adaptation measures. Results show that the optimal intertemporal distribution of climate policy measures is characterized by early investments in mitigation followed by large adaptation expenditures a few decades later. Hence, the possibility of adapting does not justify postponing mitigation. Moreover, a climate change policy combining mitigation and adaptation is less costly than mitigation alone. In this sense mitigation and adaptation are shown to be strategic complements rather than mutually exclusive.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 290
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate change policy architecture
    Schmidt, Jake
    Helme, Ned
    Lee, Jin
    Houdashelt, Mark
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2008, 8 (05) : 494 - 515
  • [2] Post-2012 climate policy dilemmas: a review of proposals
    Kuik, Onno
    Aerts, Jeroen
    Berkhout, Frans
    Biermann, Frank
    Bruggink, Jos
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    Tol, Richard S. J.
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2008, 8 (03) : 317 - 336
  • [3] Climate policy options post-2012 - European strategy, technology and adaptation after Kyoto - Preface
    Hulme, M
    Metz, B
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2005, 5 (03) : 243 - 243
  • [4] Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies
    Rafaj, Peter
    Schoepp, Wolfgang
    Russ, Peter
    Heyes, Chris
    Amann, Markus
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2013, 18 (06) : 801 - 824
  • [5] Graduation and deepening: An ambitious post-2012 climate policy scenario
    Michaelowa A.
    Butzengeiger S.
    Jung M.
    [J]. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2005, 5 (1) : 25 - 46
  • [6] US climate mitigation pathways post-2012: Transition scenarios in ADAGE
    Ross, Martin T.
    Fawcett, Allen A.
    Clapp, Christa S.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 : S212 - S222
  • [7] Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies
    Peter Rafaj
    Wolfgang Schöpp
    Peter Russ
    Chris Heyes
    Markus Amann
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2013, 18 : 801 - 824
  • [8] What Role for Trade in a Post-2012 Global Climate Policy Regime
    Whalley, John
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2011, 34 (11): : 1844 - 1862
  • [9] Three Key Elements of a Post-2012 International Climate Policy Architecture
    Olmstead, Sheila M.
    Stavins, Robert N.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2012, 6 (01) : 65 - +
  • [10] Sectoral approaches for a post-2012 climate regime: a taxonomy
    Meckling, Jonas O.
    Chung, Gu Yoon
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2009, 9 (06) : 652 - 668