Public debt games with corruption and tax evasion

被引:5
|
作者
Halkos, George E. [1 ]
Papageorgiou, George J. [1 ]
Halkos, Emmanuel G. [1 ]
Papageorgiou, John G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Econ, Lab Operat Res, 28 Octovriou, Volos 38333, Greece
关键词
Public debt; Tax evasion; Dynamic games; Nash equilibrium; Stackelberg equilibrium; GROWTH; CYCLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2020.04.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores the interactions between corruption, tax evasion, and public debt. Public debt accumulation results in disutility, therefore the key issue is whether the time path of the public debt is sustainable or not. Infinite time differential game modeling is used as an appropriate tool for the economic analysis of the sustainability of the time path. The dynamic game is a simple one, and incorporates the well known assumption that the starting point of the public debt model is the accounting identity interrelating public debt, the interest rate and the real government surplus exclusive of interest payments on public debt. In this setting, we consider as stock the public debt and the stress of the regulator as the driver in raising the nation's primary surplus. Any surplus increase is not only dependent on government measures but is also dependent on the known "culture of corruption"and on tax evasion. Consequently, the process of surpluses' augmentation should be a function of these two factors. Nash and Stackelberg differential game are used to explore strategic interactions. In the Nash equilibrium, establishment of cyclical strategies during the game between the group of people involved in illegal activities of corruption and tax evasion on the one hand and the government in the other, requires that the discount rate of the group of people involved in illegal actions must be greater than the government's discount rate. That is, the group of corrupt officials and tax evaders must be more impatient than the government. In the case of hierarchical setting analytical expressions of the strategies and the steady-state value of public debt are provided. Furthermore, a number of propositions are stated. (c) 2020 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 261
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT AND TAX EVASION
    Argentiero, Amedeo
    Cerqueti, Roy
    [J]. MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2021, 25 (03) : 669 - 692
  • [2] GENDER AND PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD CORRUPTION AND TAX EVASION
    Torgler, Benno
    Valev, Neven T.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2010, 28 (04) : 554 - 568
  • [3] Tax Evasion, Corruption and Tax Loopholes
    Marjit, Sugata
    Seidel, Andre
    Thum, Marcel
    [J]. GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 18 (03) : 283 - 301
  • [4] Corruption and firm tax evasion
    Alm, James
    Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge
    McClellan, Chandler
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2016, 124 : 146 - 163
  • [5] CORRUPTION, COMPLEXITY AND TAX EVASION
    Tanzi, Vito
    [J]. EKONOMICHESKAYA POLITIKA, 2018, 13 (06): : 36 - 53
  • [6] TAX EVASION, CORRUPTION AND TAX ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT
    Polo, Orlando Carmelo Castellanos
    Ochoa, Jose Alexander Velasquez
    Sanmartin, Andres Felipe Sanmartin
    Arango, David Alberto Garcia
    [J]. RUSSIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2023, 11 (02) : 44 - 53
  • [7] Tax evasion, tax corruption and stochastic growth
    Celimene, Fred
    Dufrenot, Gilles
    Mophou, Gisele
    N'Guerekata, Gaston
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 52 : 251 - 258
  • [8] Tax evasion; public and political corruption and international trade: a global perspective
    Kurauone, Ophias
    Kong, Yusheng
    Sun, Huaping
    Famba, Takuriramunashe
    Muzamhindo, Simbarashe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2021, 13 (06) : 698 - 729
  • [9] Tax evasion, fiscal policy and public debt: Evidence from Spain
    Herranz, Moises Merono
    Turino, Francesco
    [J]. ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2023, 47 (03)
  • [10] TAX EVASION, CORRUPTION AND MARKET ENTRY
    Seidel, Andre
    Thum, Marcel
    [J]. SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 63 (04) : 377 - 398