The ability to return to work: a patient-centered outcome parameter following glioma surgery

被引:23
|
作者
Senft, Christian [1 ,5 ]
Behrens, Marion [2 ]
Lortz, Irina [1 ]
Wenger, Katharina [3 ,5 ]
Filipski, Katharina [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Seifert, Volker [1 ,5 ]
Forster, Marie-Therese [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Schleusenweg 2-16, D-60528 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Goethe Univ Hosp, Inst Neuroradiol, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Goethe Univ, Neurol Inst, Edinger Inst, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Univ Canc Ctr Frankfurt UCT, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Frankfurt Mainz, Heidelberg, Germany
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Return to work; Glioma; Brain tumor surgery; Quality of life; AWAKE SURGERY; GRADE GLIOMAS; RESECTION; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; STIMULATION; SURVIVORS; IMPACT; EXTENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-020-03609-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background With refinements in diagnosis and therapy of gliomas, the importance of survival time as the sole outcome parameter has decreased, and patient-centered outcome parameters have gained interest. Pursuing a profession is an indispensable component of human happiness. The aim of this study was to analyze the professional outcomes besides their neuro-oncological and functional evaluation after surgery for gliomas in eloquent areas. Methods We assessed neuro-oncological and functional outcomes of patients with gliomas WHO grades II and III undergoing surgery between 2012 and 2018. All patients underwent routine follow-up and adjuvant treatment. Treatment and survival parameters were collected prospectively. Repercussions of the disease on the patients' professional status, socio-economic situation, and neurocognitive function were evaluated retrospectively with questionnaires. Results We analyzed data of 58 patients with gliomas (WHO II: 9; III: 49). Median patient age was 35.8 years (range 21-63 years). Awake surgery techniques were applied in 32 patients (55.2%). Gross total and subtotal tumor resections were achieved in 33 (56.9%) and 17 (29.3%) patients, respectively, whereas in 8 patients (13.8%) resection had to remain partial. Most patients (n = 46; 79.3%) received adjuvant treatment. Median follow up was 43.8 months (range 11-82 months). After treatment 41 patients (70.7%) were able to resume a working life. Median time until returning to work was 8.0 months (range 0.2-22.0 months). To be younger than 40 at the time of the surgery was associated with a higher probability to return to work (p < .001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that patient age < 40 years as well as occupational group and self-reported fatigue were factors independently associated with the ability to return to work. Conclusion The ability to resume professional activities following brain tumor surgery is an important patient-oriented outcome parameter. We found that the majority of patients with gliomas were able to return to work following surgical and adjuvant treatment. Preservation of neurological function is of utmost relevance for individual patients ' quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 411
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The ability to return to work: a patient-centered outcome parameter following glioma surgery
    Christian Senft
    Marion Behrens
    Irina Lortz
    Katharina Wenger
    Katharina Filipski
    Volker Seifert
    Marie-Thérèse Forster
    [J]. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2020, 149 : 403 - 411
  • [2] Prevalence and Determinants of Return to Work as a Patient-Centered Outcome in Survivors of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
    Bhatt, Neel S.
    [J]. CURRENT HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY REPORTS, 2022, 17 (06) : 228 - 242
  • [3] Prevalence and Determinants of Return to Work as a Patient-Centered Outcome in Survivors of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
    Neel S. Bhatt
    [J]. Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, 2022, 17 : 228 - 242
  • [4] Patient-Centered Outcome Instruments in Esophageal and Gastric Surgery
    Dore, Livingstone
    Fernandez, Blake
    Velanovich, Vic
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (09) : 1515 - 1522
  • [5] Patient-Centered Outcome Instruments in Esophageal and Gastric Surgery
    Livingstone Dore
    Blake Fernandez
    Vic Velanovich
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2017, 21 : 1515 - 1522
  • [6] A Call for a Return to Patient-Centered Care
    Cooper, Phyllis G.
    [J]. NURSING FORUM, 2005, 40 (03) : 73 - 74
  • [7] Needs assessment for patient-centered education and outcome metrics in robotic surgery
    Moore, Hope Nicole
    de Paula, Thais Reif
    Keller, Deborah S.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (05): : 3968 - 3973
  • [8] Needs assessment for patient-centered education and outcome metrics in robotic surgery
    Hope Nicole Moore
    Thais Reif de Paula
    Deborah S. Keller
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 3968 - 3973
  • [9] Quality of life: A patient-centered outcome
    deLateur, BJ
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (03): : 237 - 239
  • [10] Meaningful Patient-centered Outcomes 1 Year Following Cardiac Surgery
    Charles, Eric J.
    Mehaffey, J. Hunter
    Hawkins, Robert B.
    Burks, Sandra G.
    McMurry, Timothy L.
    Yarboro, Leora T.
    Kern, John A.
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    Kron, Irving L.
    Stukenborg, George J.
    Kozower, Benjamin D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 273 (06) : E247 - E254