Evaluation of the quality of the management of cancer of the corpus uteri - Selection of relevant quality indicators and implementation in Belgium

被引:17
|
作者
Werbrouck, J. [1 ]
Bouche, G. [2 ]
de Jonge, E. [3 ]
Jacomen, G. [4 ]
D'Hondt, V. [5 ]
Denys, H. [6 ]
Van Limbergen, E.
Vandermeersch, B. [7 ]
De Schutter, H. [1 ]
Van Eycken, E. [1 ]
Goffin, F. [8 ]
Amant, F.
机构
[1] Belgian Canc Registry, B-1210 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Reliable Canc Therapies, B-1853 Strombeek Bever, Belgium
[3] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg Campus St Jan, B-3600 Genk, Belgium
[4] AZ Sint Maarten, B-2570 Duffel, Belgium
[5] Inst Jules Bordet, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Ghent, Univ Hosp Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[7] Clin Ste Anne St Remi, B-1070 Anderlecht, Belgium
[8] Hop Citadelle, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
Uterine cancer; Quality indicators; Validation; National initiative; KCE methodology; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; STAGE-I; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGISTS; INTERMEDIATE-RISK; RADIATION-THERAPY; OF-CARE; TRIAL; RECOMMENDATIONS; BRACHYTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Describe the methodology and selection of quality indicators (QI) to be implemented in the EFFECT (EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment) project. EFFECT aims to monitor the variability in Quality of Care (QoC) of uterine cancer in Belgium, to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies to improve the QoC and to check the internal validity of the QI to validate the impact of process indicators on outcome. Methods. A QI list was retrieved from literature, recent guidelines and QI databases. The Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Center methodology was used for the selection process and involved an expert's panel rating the QI on 4 criteria. The resulting scores and further discussion resulted in a final QI list. An online EFFECT module was developed by the Belgian Cancer Registry including the list of variables required for measuring the QI. Three test phases were performed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility and understanding of the variables and to test the compatibility of the dataset. Results. 138 QI were considered for further discussion and 82 QI were eligible for rating. Based on the rating scores and consensus among the expert's panel, 41 QI were considered measurable and relevant. Testing of the data collection enabled optimization of the content and the user-friendliness of the dataset and online module. Conclusions. This first Belgian initiative for monitoring the QoC of uterine cancer indicates that the previously used QI selection methodology is reproducible for uterine cancer. The QI list could be applied by other research groups for comparison. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 519
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF QUALITY INDICATORS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
    Koskas, M.
    Chenoz, L.
    Phelippeau, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 214 - 214
  • [2] Evaluation and Selection of Quality Indicators for the Management of Endometrial Cancer
    Chenoz, Laure
    Phelippeau, Juliette
    Barranger, Emmanuel
    Bourdel, Nicolas
    Brun, Jean Luc
    Chereau, Elisabeth
    Collinet, Pierre
    Coutant, Charles
    Darai, Emile
    Deffieux, Xavier
    Gautier, Tristan
    Golfier, Francois
    Huchon, Cyrille
    Ouldamer, Lobna
    Rouzier, Roman
    Koskas, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (05) : 979 - 986
  • [3] EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF QUALITY INDICATORS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
    Koskas, M.
    Chenoz, L.
    Phelippeau, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 1118 - 1118
  • [4] Implementation of ISBT quality indicators in the quality management and haemovigilance systems
    Vuk, Tomislav
    [J]. STATE OF THE ART PRESENTATIONS 33RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLOOD TRANSFUSION, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE 33RD CONGRESS OF THE KSBT AND 2014 CONGRESS OF THE KOREAN HEMATOLOGY SOCIETIES, VOL 10, NO S1, 2015, 10 (S1): : 371 - 375
  • [5] Implementation of a quality system in a clinical laboratory – Evaluation of quality indicators
    M. Siloaho
    E. Puhakainen
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2000, 5 : 182 - 190
  • [6] Implementation of a quality system in a clinical laboratory - Evaluation of quality indicators
    Siloaho, M
    Puhakainen, E
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2000, 5 (05) : 182 - 190
  • [7] Quality Indicators in the Management of Bladder Cancer
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Miller, David C.
    Weizer, Alon Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2013, 11 (04): : 492 - 500
  • [8] Improving the quality of surgery for gastric cancer - Are surgeons aware of the relevant quality indicators?
    Helyer, L. K.
    Brien, C. O.
    Coburn, N. G.
    Swallow, C. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 190S - 190S
  • [9] A critical appraisal of quality indicators of breast cancer treatment in Belgium
    Verhoeven, D. M. E. C.
    Duhoux, F. P.
    de Azambuja, E.
    van Walle, L.
    Punie, K.
    Wildiers, H.
    Vuylsteke, P.
    Barbeaux, A.
    Van Damme, N.
    Van Eycken, L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [10] Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
    Baral, Shweta
    Silwal, Sudhir Raj
    Shrestha, Utsav Man
    Lamichhane, Deep
    [J]. JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8