A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations

被引:11
|
作者
Balleyguier, Corinne [1 ]
Arfi-Rouche, Julia [1 ]
Boyer, Bruno [1 ]
Gauthier, Emilien [2 ]
Helin, Valerie [2 ]
Loshkajian, Ara [1 ]
Ragusa, Stephane [2 ]
Delaloge, Suzette [1 ]
机构
[1] Gustave Roussy, Imaging Dept, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, F-94800 Villejuif, France
[2] Espace Maurice Tubiana, Predlife, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, F-94800 Villejuif, France
关键词
Mammography; Breast density; Breast cancer; Risk assessment; Software; CANCER RISK; AGREEMENT; RADIOLOGISTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-019-06016-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesRadiologists' visual assessment of breast mammographic density (BMD) is subject to inter-observer variability. We aimed to develop and validate a new automated software tool mimicking expert radiologists' consensus assessments of 2D BMD, as per BI-RADS V recommendations.MethodsThe software algorithm was developed using a concept of Manhattan distance to compare a patient's mammographic image to reference mammograms with an assigned BMD category. Reference databases were built from a total of 2289 pairs (cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique views) of 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Each image was independently assessed for BMD by a consensus of radiologists specialized in breast imaging. A validation set of additional 800 image pairs was evaluated for BMD both by the software and seven blinded radiologists specialized in breast imaging. The median score was used for consensus. Software reproducibility was assessed using FFDM image pairs from 214 patients in the validation set to compare BMD assessment between left and right breasts.ResultsThe software showed a substantial agreement with the radiologists' consensus (unweighted =0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.72) when considering the four breast density categories, and an almost perfect agreement (unweighted =0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.88) when considering clinically significant non-dense (A-B) and dense (C-D) categories. Correlation between left and right breasts was high (r(s)=0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.90).ConclusionsBMD assessment by the software was strongly correlated to radiologists' consensus assessments of BMD. Its performance should be compared to other methods, and its clinical utility evaluated in a risk assessment model.Key Points center dot A new software tool assesses breast density in a standardized way.center dot The tool mimics radiologists' clinical assessment of breast density.center dot It may be incorporated in a breast cancer risk assessment model.
引用
收藏
页码:3830 / 3838
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations
    Corinne Balleyguier
    Julia Arfi-Rouche
    Bruno Boyer
    Emilien Gauthier
    Valerie Helin
    Ara Loshkajian
    Stephane Ragusa
    Suzette Delaloge
    [J]. European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 3830 - 3838
  • [2] Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas
    Pesce, K.
    Tajerian, M.
    Chico, M. J.
    Swiecicki, M. P.
    Boietti, B.
    Frangella, M. J.
    Benitez, S.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA, 2020, 62 (06): : 481 - 486
  • [3] Mammographic breast density distribution and the fifth-edition BI-RADS criteria
    Nakano, I. T.
    Schelin, H. R.
    Denyak, V.
    Paschuk, S.
    Tacara, S.
    Setti, J. A. P.
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 167 (167)
  • [4] Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas
    Ekpo, Ernest U.
    Ujong, Ujong Peter
    Mello-Thoms, Claudia
    McEntee, Mark F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (05) : 1119 - 1123
  • [5] Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Gweon, Hye Mi
    Son, Eun Ju
    Kim, Jeong-Ah
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (05) : 1056 - 1062
  • [6] Use of Low-dose Chest CT Scan in the Evaluation of Breast Composition According to the Recommendations of BI-RADS Atlas-Fifth Edition
    Ao, Feng
    Liu, Xueguo
    Liang, Mingzhu
    Gao, Jiebing
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (02)
  • [7] Interobserver Variability and Distribution of Mammographic Breast Density in Patients with Invasive Breast Carcinoma using the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS Guidelines
    Ab Rahman, S. S.
    Kamal, Mohd L. H.
    Ab Rahman, F. H.
    Ghazali, R.
    Saidil, E.
    Nor, Mohamad N.
    [J]. IIUM MEDICAL JOURNAL MALAYSIA, 2021, 20 (03): : 12 - 17
  • [8] Comparison of Visual and Quantra Software Mammographic Density Assessment According to BI-RADS® in 2D and 3D Images
    Morciano, Francesca
    Marcazzan, Cristina
    Rella, Rossella
    Tommasini, Oscar
    Conti, Marco
    Belli, Paolo
    Spagnolo, Andrea
    Quaglia, Andrea
    Tambalo, Stefano
    Trisca, Andreea Georgiana
    Rossati, Claudia
    Fornasa, Francesca
    Romanucci, Giovanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [9] Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound
    Choi, Eun Jung
    Choi, Hyemi
    Park, Eun Hae
    Song, Ji Soo
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 99 : 138 - 145
  • [10] Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS
    Jeffers, Abra M.
    Sieh, Weiva
    Lipson, Jafi A.
    Rothstein, Joseph H.
    McGuire, Valerie
    Whittemore, Alice S.
    Rubin, Daniel L.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 282 (02) : 348 - 355