Construct Validity, Assessment of the Learning Curve, and Experience of Using a Low-Cost Arthroscopic Surgical Simulator

被引:25
|
作者
Colaco, Henry B. [1 ]
Hughes, Katie [1 ]
Pearse, Eyiyemi [1 ]
Arnander, Magnus [1 ]
Tennent, Duncan [1 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ London, Cranmer Terrace, London, England
关键词
simulation; arthroscopy; surgery; training; SKILLS; FACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.006
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We have developed a low-cost, portable shoulder simulator designed to train basic arthroscopic skills. This study aimed to establish the construct validity of the simulator by determining which parameters discriminated between experience levels and to assess the experience of using the simulator. DESIGN: Participants were given an introductory presentation and an untimed practice run of a 6-step triangulation task using hooks and rubber bands. A total of 6 consecutive attempts at the task were timed, and the number of times the participant looked at their hands during the task was recorded. Participants then completed a questionnaire on their experience of using the simulator. SETTING: St George's Hospital, London and the South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Surrey. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students, trainee doctors and surgeons, and consultant surgeons were approached to use the simulator. Participation was voluntary and nonincentivized. In total, 7 orthopedic consultants, 12 trainee doctors (ranging from foundation year 1 to clinical fellow post-Certificate of Completion of Training), and 9 medical students were recruited. RESULTS: The average time for medical students to complete the task was 161 seconds, compared to 118 seconds for trainees, and 84 seconds for consultants. The average fastest time for medical students was 105 seconds, 73 seconds for trainees, and 52 seconds for consultants. Students were significantly slower than trainees (p = 0.026) and consultants (p = 0.001). However, times did not differ significantly between trainees and consultants. Consultants looked at their hands 0.7 times on average during the task compared with 2.8 and 3.4 times for trainees and students, respectively. More than 95% of participants found the exercise interesting and agreed or strongly agreed that the simulator was easy to use, easily portable, and well designed and constructed. DISCUSSION: This study has established construct validity of the simulator by demonstrating the ability to distinguish between surgical experience levels. The learning curve shows improvement in individuals with or without arthroscopic or surgical experience. Simulation is becoming increasingly important in the training of medical students and surgical trainees; this study has established that low-cost portable arthroscopic box trainers may play a significant role. ((C) 2016 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 54
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Construct Validity and Experience of Using a Low-cost Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Simulator
    Alain Milcent, Paul Andre
    Kulcheski, Alynson Larocca
    Rosa, Fernando Martins
    Dau, Leonardo
    Stieven Filho, Edmar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 78 (01) : 292 - 301
  • [2] Construct validity and assessment of the learning curve for the SIMENDO endoscopic simulator
    Verdaasdonk, E. G. G.
    Stassen, L. P. S.
    Schijven, M. P.
    Dankelman, J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (08): : 1406 - 1412
  • [3] Construct validity and assessment of the learning curve for the SIMENDO endoscopic simulator
    E. G. G. Verdaasdonk
    L. P. S Stassen
    M. P. Schijven
    J. Dankelman
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2007, 21 : 1406 - 1412
  • [4] Construct validity of eoSim - a low-cost and portable laparoscopic simulator
    Mansoor, Saira Mauland
    Vapenstad, Cecilie
    Marvik, Ronald
    Glomsaker, Tom
    Bliksoen, Marte
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 29 (05) : 261 - 268
  • [5] Machine Learning System for Performance Feedback Using Low-Cost Surgical Simulator
    Eletta, Olanrewaju
    Hu, Andrew
    Xue, Yunzhe
    Roshan, Usman
    Ady, Justin W.
    Cai, Jenny
    Getrajdman, Joelle
    Patel, Nell Maloney
    Bongu, Advaith
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S420 - S421
  • [6] Construct Validity for a Cost-effective Arthroscopic Surgery Simulator for Resident Education
    Lopez, Gregory
    Martin, David F.
    Wright, Rick
    Jung, James
    Hahn, Peter
    Jain, Nickul
    Bracey, Daniel N.
    Gupta, Ranjan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (12) : 886 - 894
  • [7] Feasibility and Validity of a Low-Cost Racing Simulator in Driving Assessment after Stroke
    Tiu, Jonathan
    Harmon, Annie C.
    Stowe, James D.
    Zwa, Amen
    Kinnear, Marc
    Dimitrov, Latch
    Nolte, Tina
    Carr, David B.
    [J]. GERIATRICS, 2020, 5 (02)
  • [8] The validity of a low-cost simulator for the assessment of the effects of in-vehicle information systems
    Jamson, Samantha L.
    Jamson, A. Hamish
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2010, 48 (10) : 1477 - 1483
  • [9] Building and training a low-cost and portable vascular anastomosis simulator: Initial experience of a surgical resident
    Samir Cubas, W.
    [J]. CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2022, 29 (02): : 82 - 88
  • [10] AMPATH surgical app: Low-cost simulator for the open appendectomy
    Matthews, Joshua
    Bhatia, Manisha B.
    Thomas, Christopher
    Okoth, Philip
    Martinez, Carlos R.
    Levy, Jeffrey S.
    Stefanidis, Dimitrios
    Hunter-Squires, JoAnna L.
    Saruni, Seno I.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2022, 172 (06) : 1656 - 1664