Do patient-reported outcome measures for SAH include patient, family, and caregiver priorities? A scoping review

被引:15
|
作者
Saigle, Victoria [1 ]
Asad, Sarah [1 ]
Presseau, Justin [2 ,3 ]
Chasse, Michael [5 ]
McIntyre, Lauralyn [1 ,4 ]
English, Shane W. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ctr Transfus Res, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med Crit Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal Hosp, Dept Med Crit Care, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
ANEURYSMAL SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; LIAISON NURSE SERVICE; PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOMES; ASAH PATIENTS; LIFE; CARE; INVOLVEMENT; ENGAGEMENT; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1212/WNL.0000000000006883
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To systematically describe literature that identified patient/family/caregiver priorities for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), developed novel SAH PROMs by incorporating patient/family/caregiver perspectives, or involved patient/family/caregiver perspectives in evaluating existing SAH PROMs. Methods We conducted a scoping review using Embase and Ovid MEDLINE from inception to February 6, 2018. Study eligibility and data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate. For each eligible citation, we abstracted information about study population, design, type of patient involvement, and outcome measures. We planned a descriptive summary of all included studies. Results Our search yielded 4,961 citations, of which 15 met our eligibility criteria. Four of these included duplicate data, so our final sample consisted of 12 articles. There were 879 patients with SAH and 241 carers from the 11/12 articles that reported these data. One additional study involved 70 individuals but did not specify the number of carers or patients. We did not find any studies where SAH survivors or their families were directly involved in the full continuum of PROM outcome conceptualization from development to evaluation. We found 41 measures identified by patients with SAH. We identified only 2 PROMs developed with patients and only one that was a post hoc evaluation by patients. These 3 PROMs are subarachnoid hemorrhage outcome tool, Wessex Patient Carer Questionnaire, and Functional Status Examination, respectively. Conclusion We identified 3 PROMs that have involved patients in some way, but the extent to which they reflect patient priorities remains unclear. More work is needed to ensure SAH research is not overlooking outcomes that are important to patients.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 295
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Janic, Ana
    Bowden, Sylvie
    Levy, Sarah
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Dimaras, Helen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [2] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Ana Janic
    Sylvie Bowden
    Sarah Levy
    Jennifer Stinson
    Helen Dimaras
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4
  • [3] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Vedadi, Ali
    Khairalla, Roula
    Che, Adrian
    Nagee, Ahsas
    Saqib, Mohammed
    Ayub, Ali
    Wasim, Aghna
    Macanovic, Sara
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Selzner-Malekkiani, Nazia
    Bartlett, Susan
    Mucsi, Istvan
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (09) : 2435 - 2445
  • [4] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Ali Vedadi
    Roula Khairalla
    Adrian Che
    Ahsas Nagee
    Mohammed Saqib
    Ali Ayub
    Aghna Wasim
    Sara Macanovic
    Ani Orchanian-Cheff
    Nazia Selzner-Malekkiani
    Susan Bartlett
    Istvan Mucsi
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2435 - 2445
  • [5] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Wiering, Bianca
    de Boer, Dolf
    Delnoij, Diana
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Scoping Review
    Voet, Nicoline
    Pater, Ronne
    Garmendia, Joana
    Sistiaga, Andone
    Labayru, Garazi
    Gallais, Benjamin
    de Groot, Ingrid
    Muslemani, Samar
    Gagnon, Cynthia
    Graham, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 11 (03) : 567 - 577
  • [7] Patient-reported outcome measures for rehabilitation hospitals: a scoping review
    Thwaites, Claire
    Rowntree, Nicole
    Hodge, Anita
    Fowler-Davis, Sally
    McKercher, Jonathan P.
    Weerasekara, Ishanka
    Rovtar, Vincent
    Knight, Matthew
    Jones, Cathy
    Morris, Meg E.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2023, 28 (4-6) : 278 - 290
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
    Torbjornsen, Astrid
    Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
    Singstad, Tone
    Weldingh, Nina Mickelson
    Holmen, Heidi
    [J]. BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [9] Patient-reported outcome measures in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol
    Poulsen, Ninna Rysholt
    Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen
    Sovso, Morten Breinholt
    Leutscher, Peter Derek Christian
    Pedersen, Mona Kyndi
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (11) : 3102 - 3112
  • [10] Guidelines for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Jung, Andres
    Challoumas, Dimitris
    Pagels, Larissa
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Braun, Tobias
    Luedtke, Kerstin
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024,