Integrating climate and food policies in higher education: a case study of the University of California

被引:14
|
作者
Cleveland, David Arthur [1 ,2 ]
Jay, Jennifer Ayla [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Environm Studies Program, Santa Barbara, CA 93110 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Geog, Santa Barbara, CA 93110 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
climate policy and food policy integration; climate change mitigation policy; food system greenhouse gas emissions; higher education institutions' climate policies; Scope 3 greenhouse emissions; University of California; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; HEALTH; DIETS; SUSTAINABILITY; LAND; BEEF; MEAT;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2020.1787939
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Most climate change mitigation policies, including those of higher education institutions, do not include food system greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE). Yet the food system contributes similar to 30% of anthropogenic GHGE, mostly from animal source foods. Food system changes are necessary to meet GHGE mitigation targets and could do so relatively inexpensively and rapidly with major health, social and environmental co-benefits. To estimate the potential impact of integrating higher education institution climate and food policies, we used the case of the University of California (UC), comprising 10 campuses with 280,000 students. The UC is a leader in climate and food research, and has major policy initiatives for mitigating climate change and for promoting healthy, sustainable food systems. Like most higher education institutions, the UC climate change mitigation target for 2025 covers only Scope 1 and 2 GHGE (campus-generated and purchased energy), yet Scope 3 GHGE (indirect, including food system) are often institutions' largest. We created scenarios using results of studies of US dietary changes, and existing, planned or potential UC food system changes. These scenarios could reduce UC Scope 3 food emissions by 42-55%, equivalent to 8-9% of UC's targeted energy GHGE reduction, and 19-22% of offsets need to reach that target. These results have implications for broader climate policy in terms of food systems' high GHGE, the health, environmental, economic and social benefits of food system changes, and ways these changes could be implemented. To our knowledge this is one of the first empirical studies of the potential for integrating climate and food policy in HEIs. Key policy insights Most higher education institution climate policies, including those of the University of California (UC), do not include food system GHGE Research at higher education institutions makes major contributions to understanding the need to reduce food system GHGE to achieve Paris Agreement goals Higher education institutions, including UC, have made many food system changes, but their climate co-benefits are not optimized, documented or integrated with climate policies Our food system change scenarios show that UC's food system could substantially reduce GHGE These changes can incentivize UC and other higher education institutions to integrate their climate and food policies.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 32
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contesting sexual violence policies in higher education: the case of Rhodes University
    Macleod, Catriona Ida
    Bohmke, Werner
    Mavuso, Jabulile
    Barker, Kim
    Chiweshe, Malvern
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGGRESSION CONFLICT AND PEACE RESEARCH, 2018, 10 (02) : 83 - 92
  • [2] Integrating assessment and Recognition of Prior Learning in South African higher education: a university case study
    Frick, Liezel
    Bitzer, Eli
    Leibowitz, Brenda
    [J]. EDUCATION AS CHANGE, 2007, 11 (02) : 131 - 155
  • [3] University air travel and greenhouse gas mitigation: an analysis of higher education climate policies
    Schmidt, Anthony
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (06) : 1426 - 1442
  • [4] A ROADMAP FOR BUILDING CLIMATE RESILIENCE AT HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: A CASE STUDY OF ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
    Campbell, Hailey
    Crippen, Alise
    Hawkey, Corey
    Dalrymple, Mick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2020, 15 (04): : 237 - 256
  • [5] A roadmap for building climate resilience at higher education institutions: A case study of arizona state university
    Campbell, Hailey
    Crippen, Alise
    Hawkey, Corey
    Dalrymple, Mick
    [J]. Journal of Green Building, 2020, 15 (04): : 237 - 256
  • [6] A model of integrating elder learning into higher education: a case from a Hong Kong university
    Tam, Maureen
    Wu, Alice Xue
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFELONG EDUCATION, 2020, 39 (04) : 356 - 373
  • [7] Brazilian Higher Education Policies, The ETHOS and the role of the University
    Lucchesi, Martha A. S.
    [J]. RADICAL PEDAGOGY, 2008, 9 (02):
  • [8] Crossing borders in higher education? A comparative case study at the intersections of EU regional and higher education policies
    Felder, Alina
    [J]. EASTERN JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES, 2020, 11 : 28 - 46
  • [9] Marketing Higher Education in Texas: Trinity University as a Case Study
    Brackenridge, R. Douglas
    Davis, Charlene
    [J]. SOUTHWESTERN HISTORICAL QUARTERLY, 2024, 127 (04)
  • [10] Integrating Environmental Protection and Sustainable Waste Practices Among the Communities in Higher Education Institutions: Case Study in a Malaysian University
    Chan, Siok Sin
    Ng, Theam Foo
    Hassan, Mohd Sayuti
    Ying, Chee Keat
    Tan, Mei Lan
    Radzi, Siti Fairuz Mohd
    Abou Assi, Reem
    Chan, Siok-Yee
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10