The synergy between osmotically assisted reverse osmosis (OARO) and the use of thermo-responsive draw solutions for energy efficient, zero-liquid discharge desalination

被引:25
|
作者
Peters, Christian D. [1 ]
Hankins, Nicholas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Parks Rd, Oxford OX3 1PJ, England
关键词
Draw solution assisted reverse osmosis (DSARO); Osmotically-enhanced; dewatering; (OED); Split-feed reverse osmosis (SFRO); Forward osmosis; Osmotically assisted reverse osmosis; AMMONIA-CARBON DIOXIDE; MEMBRANE DISTILLATION; CHLORALKALI INDUSTRY; IONIC LIQUID; WASTE-WATER; BRINE; TECHNOLOGIES; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2020.114630
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Conventional zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) processes alleviate environmental concerns associated with brine discharge, but are not widely applied, due to their high cost and significant energy consumption. However, new and promising ZLD technologies, such as those integrated with osmotically assisted reverse osmosis (OARO), may be technically and economically more favourable than existing technologies. In this study, a numerical comparison between an FO and an OARO integrated ZLD process is performed, in which a thermo-responsive draw solution is utilised for both. The findings from the parametric and technoeconomic analysis indicate that OARO mitigates several shortcomings of FO, making it more energy efficient (energy savings of approximate to 10.8%), less susceptible to internal concentration polarisation and more economical (cost savings of approximate to 15.5%). Furthermore, a key advantage of OARO is that it operates with lower draw solute concentrations allowing for the draw solute to be regenerated at temperatures 12 degrees C lower than with FO operation. This means that low-grade waste heat (LGWH), which is essentially 'free energy', is more easily utilised as an energy source. In comparison to other hydraulic pressure-driven ZLD technologies, such as low-salt-rejection RO (LSRRO), the electrical energy consumption of OARO can be significantly offset when powered by LGWH and using a thermo-responsive draw solute. The specific electrical energy consumption can be as low as 3.47 kWh/m(3) when concentrating a saline stream from 0.6 M to 4 M using 4 membrane stages. At the same time, a 4-stage LSRRO system would consume approximately 48% more electricity to achieve the same concentration factor. Furthermore, OARO processes operating with a thermo-responsive draw solution can outperform those using non-responsive draw solutes (i.e. NaCl). Brine concentrations of up to 245 g/kg can be achieved using technically feasible operating pressures and draw solute concentrations, while the number of required membrane stages is almost halved from 6 to 4.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Using Reverse Osmosis Membrane at High Temperature for Water Recovery and Regeneration from Thermo-Responsive Ionic Liquid-Based Draw Solution for Efficient Forward Osmosis
    Kamio, Eiji
    Kurisu, Hiroki
    Takahashi, Tomoki
    Matsuoka, Atsushi
    Yoshioka, Tomohisa
    Nakagawa, Keizo
    Matsuyama, Hideto
    [J]. MEMBRANES, 2021, 11 (08)