Student pharmacists' performance and perceptions on an evidence-based medicine objective structured clinical examination

Background and purpose: Studies have examined evidence-based medicine (EBM) focused objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) in medical training, but data are lacking in pharmacy trainees. This study sought to assess student pharmacists' performance on and perceptions of a novel EBM OSCE. Educational activity and setting: This EBM OSCE included answering a drug-information inquiry, researching background questions, calling a simulated provider to acquire specific patient information, developing a foreground clinical question, reviewing pre-appraised trial synopses, and applying evidence to write a recommendation. Pharmacy faculty served as simulated providers and assessed students on knowledge/analytical (AC) and global communication (GC) skills. Students completed a worksheet (WS) that included developing a patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) statement, trial selection, and clinical recommendation. After OSCE completion, students were surveyed regarding perceptions of their performance and OSCE applicability. Outcomes assessed were performance scores (AC, GC, WS) and student perceptions. Findings: One-hundred twenty-nine students completed the survey and were included in analysis. AC, WS, and GC performance [median (IQR)] were 75.0 (37.8), 86.4 (36.9), and 88.9 (22.2), respectively, on a 100-point scale. On the WS, 89% of students developed a suitable searchable clinical question and 61% selected the correct trial synopsis to apply to the case. Students felt literature application and WS development were most challenging. A majority of students felt this OSCE increased comfort in engaging with providers (74%) and that these skills correlate with real clinical scenarios (77%). Summary: OSCEs can be a valuable tool for simulating clinical scenarios and assessing student pharmacists' EBM skills.