Distribution free estimation of heteroskedastic binary response models using Probit/Logit criterion functions

被引:20
|
作者
Khan, Shakeeb [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Econ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Binary response; Heteroskedasticity; Probit/Logit; Sieve estimation; DISCRETE RESPONSE; CONVERGENCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.08.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper estimators for distribution free heteroskedastic binary response models are proposed. The estimation procedures are based on relationships between distribution free models with a conditional median restriction and parametric models (such as Probit/Logit) exhibiting (multiplicative) heteroskedasticity. The first proposed estimator is based on the observational equivalence between the two models, and is a semiparametric sieve estimator (see, e.g. Gallant and Nychka (1987), Ai and Chen (2003) and Chen et al. (2005)) for the regression coefficients, based on maximizing standard Logit/Probit criterion functions, such as NLLS and MLE. This procedure has the advantage that choice probabilities and regression coefficients are estimated simultaneously. The second proposed procedure is based on the equivalence between existing semiparametric estimators for the conditional median model (Manski, 1975, 1985; Horowitz, 1992) and the standard parametric (Probit/Logit) NLLS estimator. This estimator has the advantage of being implementable with standard software packages such as Stata. Distribution theory is developed for both estimators and a Monte Carlo study indicates they both perform well in finite samples. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 182
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distribution-free estimation of heteroskedastic binary response models in Stata
    Blevins, Jason R.
    Khan, Shakeeb
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (03): : 588 - 602
  • [2] A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN BINARY LOGIT AND PROBIT MODELS
    Tektas, Derya
    Guenay, Sueleyman
    [J]. HACETTEPE JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 37 (02): : 167 - 176
  • [3] Optimal designs for the logit and probit models for binary data
    Sitter, RR
    Fainaru, I
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 1997, 25 (02): : 175 - 190
  • [4] COMPARISON OF PROBIT AND LOGIT MODELS FOR ESTIMATION OF LDO1
    FARMER, J
    [J]. FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1974, 33 (03) : 220 - 220
  • [5] Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?
    Berry, William D.
    DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R.
    Esarey, Justin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (01) : 248 - 266
  • [6] On probit versus logit dynamic mixed models for binary panel data
    Sutradhar, Brajendra C.
    Bari, Wasimul
    Das, Kalyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2010, 80 (04) : 421 - 441
  • [7] Estimation of consistent Logit and Probit models using best, worst and best-worst choices
    Delle Site, Paolo
    Kilani, Karim
    Gatta, Valerio
    Marcucci, Edoardo
    de Palma, Andre
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2019, 128 : 87 - 106
  • [8] Analysis of large truck crash severity using heteroskedastic ordered probit models
    Lemp, Jason D.
    Kockelman, Kara M.
    Unnikrishnan, Avinash
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2011, 43 (01): : 370 - 380
  • [9] A comparison of Logit and Probit models using Monte Carlo simulation
    Ma, Jun
    Li, Congying
    [J]. 2021 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2021, : 8963 - 8967
  • [10] Informational content of special regressors in heteroskedastic binary response models
    Chen, Songnian
    Khan, Shakeeb
    Tang, Xun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2016, 193 (01) : 162 - 182