Conversion From Prograf to Advagraf in Adolescents With Stable Liver Transplants: Comparative Pharmacokinetics and 1-Year Follow-Up

被引:11
|
作者
Carcas-Sansuan, Antonio J. [1 ,2 ]
Hierro, Loreto [3 ]
Almeida-Paulo, Gonzalo N. [2 ]
Frauca, Esteban [3 ]
Tong, Hoi Yan [1 ,2 ]
Diaz, Carmen [3 ]
Pinana, Enrique [1 ,2 ]
Frias-Iniesta, Jesus [1 ,2 ]
Jara, Paloma [3 ]
机构
[1] La Paz Univ Hosp, Clin Pharmacol Serv, Madrid, Spain
[2] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Madrid 28046, Spain
[3] La Paz Pediat Hosp, Dept Pediat Hepatol & Transplantat, Madrid, Spain
关键词
TWICE-DAILY TACROLIMUS; ONCE-DAILY TACROLIMUS; EXTENDED-RELEASE FORMULATION; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; RECIPIENTS; CYP3A5; POPULATION; ADHERENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/lt.23711
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The recommended dose of Advagraf for conversion from Prograf is considered to be 1:1 on a milligram basis. However, the long-term equivalence of Prograf and Advagraf has been questioned. The relative bioavailability of Advagraf and Prograf was evaluated in a single-center, open-label study of Prograf-to-Advagraf conversion in 20 patients, ranging in age from 12 to 18 years, who had a stable liver transplant and were receiving Prograf. After the supervised administration of Prograf for 7 days, the patients were converted to Advagraf. On days 7 and 14, serial blood samples were obtained for tacrolimus determinations. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with a noncompartmental approach, and the relative bioavailability of both formulations was calculated according to standard statistical methods. Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 3A5 (rs776746), adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette B1 (rs1045642), POR*28 (rs1057868), and POR (rs2868177) were determined with standard methods. The clinical and analytical data from a 1-year follow-up period were collected for all patients 30, 90, 180, and 360 days after conversion. The mean ratios for C-max and AUC(0-24) were 96.9 (90% confidence interval = 85.37-110.19) and 100.1 (90% confidence interval = 90.8-112.1), respectively. No relationship was found between the patients' genotypes and the pharmacokinetic tacrolimus values. During the follow-up, biochemical parameters (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, bilirubin, cystatin C, and creatinine) did not change significantly; 3 patients presented with relevant clinical events, but no event was considered to be related to tacrolimus. A decrease in tacrolimus blood levels and an increase in dose/level ratios were observed 3 and 6 months after conversion, but they returned to basal levels by month 12. In conclusion, conversion from Prograf to Advagraf with a 1:1 dose equivalence is appropriate as an initial guideline. Our 1-year follow-up showed a transient decrease in tacrolimus levels, so closer monitoring of tacrolimus levels may be required after conversion. Liver Transpl 19:1151-1158, 2013. (c) 2013 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1158
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in stable paediatric renal transplant patients and 1-year follow-up
    Antonio J. Carcas-Sansuán
    Laura Espinosa-Román
    Gonzalo N. Almeida-Paulo
    Angel Alonso-Melgar
    Carmen García-Meseguer
    Carlota Fernández-Camblor
    Nicolás Medrano
    Elena Ramirez
    [J]. Pediatric Nephrology, 2014, 29 : 117 - 123
  • [2] Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in stable paediatric renal transplant patients and 1-year follow-up
    Carcas-Sansuan, Antonio J.
    Espinosa-Roman, Laura
    Almeida-Paulo, Gonzalo N.
    Alonso-Melgar, Angel
    Garcia-Meseguer, Carmen
    Fernandez-Camblor, Carlota
    Medrano, Nicolas
    Ramirez, Elena
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 29 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [3] Conversion From Prograf to Advagraf in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: Better Renal Function After 3-Year Follow-up
    Spagnoletti, G.
    Gargiulo, A.
    Salerno, M. P.
    Favi, E.
    Pedroso, J. A.
    Calia, R.
    Romagnoli, J.
    Citterio, F.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 46 (07) : 2224 - 2227
  • [4] CONVERSION FROM PROGRAF TO ADVAGRAF IN ADOLESCENTS WITH NORMAL GRAFT FUNCTION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    Hierro, Loreto
    Pinana, Enrique
    Frauca, Esteban
    de la Vega, Angela
    Camarena, Carmen
    Munoz Bartolo, Gema
    Diaz, Carmen
    Dolores Lledin, Maria
    Hernandez, Francisco
    Leal, Nuria
    Gamez, Manuel
    Luis Encinas, Jose
    Lopez Santamaria, Manuel
    Carcas, Antonio
    Jara, Paloma
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 : 87 - 87
  • [5] Switch from Prograf® to Advagraf® in Kidney Transplantation. Long Term Follow-Up
    Iaria, G.
    Sforza, D.
    Ciano, P.
    Toti, L.
    Anselmo, A.
    Scaramuzzo, R.
    Tisone, G.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (10) : 754 - 754
  • [6] CONVERSION FROM PROGRAF TO ADVAGRAF IN ADOLESCENTS WITH NORMAL GRAFT FUNCTION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION: BIOEQUIVALENCE ON 1:1 DAILY DOSE
    Jara, Paloma
    Hierro, Loreto
    Pinana, Enrique
    Camarena, Carmen
    de la Vega, Angela
    Frauca, Esteban
    Munoz Bartolo, Gema
    Diaz, Carmen
    Hernandez, Francisco
    Leal, Nuria
    Murcia, Javier
    Gamez, Manuel
    Lopez Santamaria, Manuel
    Carcas, Antonio J.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (07) : S71 - S72
  • [7] ACTOBAT: 1-year follow-up
    Paneth, N
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1997, 100 (05) : 903 - 903
  • [8] STREAM 1-year follow-up
    Taylor, Jennifer
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) : 134 - 134
  • [9] Fluoxetine in depressed AUD adolescents: A 1-year follow-up evaluation
    Cornelius, JR
    Bukstein, OG
    Salloum, IM
    Kelly, TM
    Wood, DS
    Clark, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [10] Antipsychotic Use in Children and Adolescents A 1-Year Follow-Up Study
    Baeza, Inmaculada
    de la Serna, Elena
    Calvo-Escalona, Rosa
    Morer, Astrid
    Merchan-Naranjo, Jessica
    Tapia, Cecilia
    Carmen Martinez-Cantarero, Ma.
    Andres, Patricia
    Alda, Jose A.
    Sanchez, Bernardo
    Arango, Celso
    Castro-Fornieles, Josefina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 34 (05) : 613 - 619