Influence of curriculum type on student performance in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 exams: problem-based learning vs. lecture-based curriculum

被引:51
|
作者
Enarson, C
Cariaga-Lo, L
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Grad Sch, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
curriculum; educational measurement/methods; education; medical; licensure; problem-based learning; United States;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01058.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction The results of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 examinations are reported for students enrolled in a problem-based and traditional lecture-based curricula over a seven-year period at a single institution. There were no statistically significant differences in mean scores on either examination over the seven year period as a whole. There were statistically significant main effects noted by cohort year and curricular track for both the Step 1 and 2 examinations. These results support the general, long-term effectiveness of problem-based learning with respect to basic and clinical science knowledge acquisition. Context This paper reports the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 results for students enrolled in a problem-based and traditional lecture-based learning curricula over the seven-year period (1992-98) in order to evaluate the adequacy of each curriculum in supporting students learning of the basic and clinical sciences. Methods Six hundred and eighty-nine students who took the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 540 students who took Step 2 for the first time over the seven-year period were included in the analyses. T-test analyses were utilized to compare students' Step 1 and Step 2 performance by curriculum groups. Results United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores over the seven-year period were 214 for Traditional Curriculum students and 208 for Parallel Curriculum students (t-value = 1.32, P = 0.21). Mean Step 2 scores over the seven-year period were 208 for Traditional Curriculum students and 206 for Parallel Curriculum students (t-value = 1.08, P = 0.30). Statistically significant main effects were noted by cohort year and curricular track for both the Step 1 and Step 2 examinations. Conclusion The totality of experience in both groups, although differing by curricular type, may be similar enough that the comparable scores are what should be expected. These results should be reassuring to curricular planners and faculty that problem-based learning can provide students with the knowledge needed for the subsequent phases of their medical education.
引用
收藏
页码:1050 / 1055
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Student performances on Step 1 and Step 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination following implementation of a problem-based learning curriculum
    Blake, RL
    Hosokawa, MC
    Riley, SL
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [2] The Effect of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Curriculum on United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Performance
    Fagin, Adam P.
    Engelstad, Mark E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (05) : 898 - 903
  • [3] Two perspectives on the effects of a curriculum change: Student experience and the United States Medical Licensing Examination, Step 1
    Wilkerson, LuAnn
    Wimmers, Paul
    Doyle, Lawrence H.
    Uijtdehaage, Sebastian
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (10) : S117 - S120
  • [4] A small group, problem-based learning approach to preparing students to retake step 1 of the united states medical licensing examination
    Walters, JA
    Croen, LG
    Weissman, ZB
    Reichgott, MJ
    [J]. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1999, 11 (02) : 85 - 88
  • [5] The development of self-regulated learning during the pre-clinical stage of medical school: a comparison between a lecture-based and a problem-based curriculum
    Susanna M. Lucieer
    Jos N. van der Geest
    Silvana M. Elói-Santos
    Rosa M. Delbone de Faria
    Laura Jonker
    Chris Visscher
    Remy M. J. P. Rikers
    Axel P. N. Themmen
    [J]. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2016, 21 : 93 - 104
  • [6] The development of self-regulated learning during the pre-clinical stage of medical school: a comparison between a lecture-based and a problem-based curriculum
    Lucieer, Susanna M.
    van der Geest, Jos N.
    Eloi-Santos, Silvana M.
    de Faria, Rosa M. Delbone
    Jonker, Laura
    Visscher, Chris
    Rikers, Remy M. J. P.
    Themmen, Axel P. N.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 21 (01) : 93 - 104
  • [7] QUALITY OF LIFE IN MEDICAL EDUCATION - EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF A PROBLEM-BASED VS. TRADITIONAL MEDICAL CURRICULUM ON STUDENT WELLBEING OVER TIME
    Bullinger, Monika
    Kuhnigk, Olaf
    Kandulla, Maren
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (09) : 2047 - 2047
  • [8] Educational Videos Versus Question Banks: Maximizing Medical Student Performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Exam
    Clemmons, Karina R.
    Vuk, Jasna
    Jarrett, Diane M.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [9] Effects of Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 After Core Clerkships on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Performance
    Jurich, Daniel
    Santen, Sally A.
    Paniagua, Miguel
    Fleming, Amy
    Harnik, Victoria
    Pock, Arnyce
    Swan-Sein, Aubrie
    Barone, Michael A.
    Daniel, Michelle
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2020, 95 (01) : 111 - 121
  • [10] Predicting United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Scores from Previous Academic Performance Measures within a Longitudinal Interleaved Curriculum
    Kracaw, Rachel A.
    Dizon, Wynona
    Antonio, Sabrina
    Simanton, Edward
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (09)