Orphan Drugs for Rare Diseases Is it Time to Revisit Their Special Market Access Status?

被引:37
|
作者
Simoens, Steven [1 ]
Cassiman, David [2 ]
Dooms, Marc [3 ]
Picavet, Eline [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Res Ctr Pharmaceut Care & Pharmacoecon, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven Hosp, Dept Hepatol, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven Hosp, Hosp Pharm, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; TECHNOLOGIES; EUROPE;
D O I
10.2165/11635320-000000000-00000
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Orphan drugs are intended for diseases with a very low prevalence, and many countries have implemented legislation to support market access of orphan drugs. We argue that it is time to revisit the special market access status of orphan drugs. Indeed, evidence suggests that there is no societal preference for treating rare diseases. Although society appears to assign a greater value to severity of disease, this criterion is equally relevant to many common diseases. Furthermore, the criterion of equity in access to treatment, which underpins orphan drug legislation, puts more value on health improvement in rare diseases than in common diseases and implies that population health is not maximized. Finally, incentives for the development, pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs have created market failures, including monopolistic prices and the artificial creation of rare diseases. We argue that, instead of awarding special market access status to orphan drugs, there is scope to optimize research and development (R&D) of orphan drugs and to control prices of orphan drugs by means of, for example, patent auctions, advance purchase commitments, pay-as-you-go schemes and dose-modification studies. Governments should consider carefully the right incentive strategy for R&D of orphan drugs in rare diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:1437 / 1443
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Orphan Drugs for Rare DiseasesIs it Time to Revisit Their Special Market Access Status?
    Steven Simoens
    David Cassiman
    Marc Dooms
    Eline Picavet
    [J]. Drugs, 2012, 72 : 1437 - 1443
  • [2] Orphan Drugs for Rare Diseases: Grounds for Special Status
    Picavet, Eline
    Dooms, Marc
    Cassiman, David
    Simoens, Steven
    [J]. DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2012, 73 (03) : 115 - 119
  • [3] Drugs for Rare Diseases: Influence of Orphan Designation Status on Price
    Picavet, Eline
    Dooms, Marc
    Cassiman, David
    Simoens, Steven
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 9 (04) : 275 - 279
  • [4] Rare diseases and orphan drugs
    Aronson, JK
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 61 (03) : 243 - 245
  • [5] Rare diseases and orphan drugs
    Irena Melnikova
    [J]. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2012, 11 : 267 - 268
  • [6] RARE DISEASES AND ORPHAN DRUGS
    DAINA, E
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 343 (8912): : 1560 - 1561
  • [7] Orphan drugs and rare diseases
    Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
    Stephani, Ulrich
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EPILEPTOLOGIE, 2019, 32 (04): : 263 - 263
  • [8] Rare diseases and orphan drugs
    Melnikova, Irena
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2012, 11 (04) : 267 - 268
  • [9] Rare diseases and orphan drugs
    Taruscio, Domenica
    Capozzoli, Fiorentino
    Frank, Claudio
    [J]. ANNALI DELL ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA, 2011, 47 (01): : 83 - 93
  • [10] Rare diseases and "orphan" drugs
    Hillcoat, BL
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1998, 169 (02) : 69 - 70