Effect of Joint Line Elevation after Posterior-stabilized and Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty on Clinical Function and Kinematics

被引:17
|
作者
Ji, Song-Jie [1 ]
Zhou, Yi-Xin [1 ]
Jiang, Xu [1 ]
Cheng, Zhi-Yuan [2 ]
Wang, Guang-Zhi [3 ]
Ding, Hui [3 ]
Yang, Ming-Lei [3 ]
Zhu, Zhong-Lin [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Clin Coll 4, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Beijing Jishuitan Hosp, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Clin Coll 4, Dept Radiol, Beijing Jishuitan Hosp, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Sch Med, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fluoroscopic Analysis; Kinematics; Posterior Cruciate-retaining; Posterior-stabilized; Total Knee Arthroplasty; Two-dimensional/Three-dimensional Registration; VIVO FLUOROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; ADDUCTOR TUBERCLE; BONY LANDMARKS; RESTORATION; FLEXION; GEOMETRY; ACCURATE; SYSTEM; FORCES; LEVEL;
D O I
10.4103/0366-6999.168043
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Joint line (JL) is a very important factor for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to restore. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early clinical and kinematic results of TKAs with posterior-stabilized (PS) or cruciate retaining (CR) implants in which the JL was elevated postoperatively. Methods: Data were collected from patients who underwent TKA in our department between April 2011 and April 2014. The patients were divided into two groups based on the prosthesis they received (PS or CR). At 1-year postoperatively, clinical outcomes were evaluated by the American Knee Society (AKS) knee score, AKS function score, and patella score. In vivo kinematic analysis after TKA was performed on all patients and a previously validated three-dimensional to two-dimensional image registration technique was used to obtain the kinematic data. Anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral femoral condyles, and axial rotation relative to the tibial plateau, were analyzed. The data were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: At time of follow-up, there were differences in the AKS knee scores (P = 0.005), AKS function scores (P = 0.025), patella scores (P = 0.015), and postoperative range of motions (P = 0.004) between the PS group and the CR group. In the PS group, the magnitude of AP translation for the medial and lateral condyle was 4.9 +/- 3.0 mm and 12.8 +/- 3.3 mm, respectively. Axial rotation of the tibial component relative to the femoral component was 12.9 +/- 4.5 degrees. In the CR group, the magnitude of AP translation for the medial and lateral condyle was 4.3 +/- 3.5 mm and 7.9 +/- 4.2 mm, respectively. The axial rotation was 6.7 +/- 5.9 degrees. There were statistically different between PS group and CR group in kinematics postoperatively. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that postoperative JL elevation had more adverse effects on the clinical and kinematic outcomes of CR TKAs than PS TKAs.
引用
收藏
页码:2866 / 2872
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Joint Line Elevation after Posterior-stabilized and Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty on Clinical Function and Kinematics
    Ji Song-Jie
    Zhou Yi-Xin
    Jiang Xu
    Cheng Zhi-Yuan
    Wang Guang-Zhi
    Ding Hui
    Yang Ming-Lei
    Zhu Zhong-Lin
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2015, 128 (21) : 2866 - 2872
  • [2] Outcomes of Posterior-Stabilized Compared with Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Ciuffreda, Mauro
    Mannering, Nicholas
    D'Andrea, Valerio
    Locher, Joel
    Salvatore, Giuseppe
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (04) : 321 - 340
  • [3] Cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: The argument for posterior cruciate substitution
    Tria, AJ
    ARTHROPLASTY 2000: RECENT ADVANCES IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT, 2001, : 205 - 209
  • [4] Joint line changes in cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty
    Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak
    Hee Nee Pang
    Seng Jin Yeo
    Mann Hong Tan
    Ngai Nung Lo
    Hwei Chi Chong
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2013, 133 : 853 - 859
  • [5] Comparison of the biomechanical effect of posterior condylar offset and kinematics between posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty
    Kang, Kyoung-Tak
    Kwon, Sae Kwang
    Kwon, Oh-Ryong
    Lee, Jun-Sang
    Koh, Yong-Gon
    KNEE, 2019, 26 (01): : 250 - 257
  • [6] Joint line changes in cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty
    Bin Abd Razak, Hamid Rahmatullah
    Pang, Hee Nee
    Yeo, Seng Jin
    Tan, Mann Hong
    Lo, Ngai Nung
    Chong, Hwei Chi
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2013, 133 (06) : 853 - 859
  • [7] What to Know for Selecting Cruciate-Retaining or Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Song, Sang Jun
    Park, Cheol Hee
    Bae, Dae Kyung
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 11 (02) : 142 - 150
  • [8] Soft Tissue Tension in Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
    Muratsu, Hirotsugu
    Kubo, Seiji
    Matsushita, Takehiko
    Kurosaka, Masahiro
    Kuroda, Ryosuke
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (05): : 788 - 795
  • [9] Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty - Balancing the gap
    Tanzer, M
    Smith, K
    Burnett, S
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (07): : 813 - 819
  • [10] Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis
    Bercik, Michael J.
    Joshi, Ashish
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (03): : 439 - 444