Airway sealing pressures of the laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients

被引:30
|
作者
Epstein, RH
Ferouz, F
Jenkins, MA
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
[2] Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107
关键词
laryngeal mask airway; cuff pressure; elastance; leak test; nitrous oxide;
D O I
10.1016/0952-8180(95)00173-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objectives: To determine if the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) seal is maintained during surgery, to evaluate the safety of an LMA leak test, and to determine the time course of the increase in LMA cuff pressure in vivo in the presence of nitrous oxide (N2O). Study Design: Descriptive clinical study. Setting: University teaching hospital. Patients: 78 ASA Physical Status I and II pediatric patients, aged 3 months to 17 years, undergoing general anesthesia with an LMA; 14 patients were studied on two occasions approximately 2 months apart. Interventions: The airway pressure at which the LMA seal was broken (leak pressure) was determined immediately following insertion of the LMA and al the end of surgery. In 17 patients, the LMA cuff pressure was continuously measured during surgery during which 67% N2O was administered. The mean duration of surgery was 29.5 minutes. Interventions: The airway pressure at which the LMA seal was broken (leak pressure) was determined immediately following insertion of the LMA and at the end of surgery. In 17 patients, the LMA cuff pressure was continuously measured during surgery during which 67% N2O was administered. The mean duration of surgery was 29.5 minutes. Measurements and Main Results: The LMA leak pressure was determined by closing the circuit popoff valve and recording the pressure at which gas was first heard to escape around the LMA at the mouth. The LMA cuff pressure was determined by connecting the check valve of the LMA Pilot balloon to a sphygmomanometer. The elastance of the LMA was determined from the slopes of the regression lines of pressure versus volume for the various sized LMAs in vitro (Sizes 1-4) and in vivo (sizes 2 and 21/2). The initial LMA leak pressure was 25.9 cm H2O, and it increased to 31.2 cm H2O during surgery (p < 0.001). 146 leak tests were performed without causing gastric dilatation or LMA dislodgement. The mean LMA cuff pressure increased during surgery from 106.2 mmHg to 132.8 mmHg (p < 0.001), a pressure increase that corresponds to a volume increase of 1.4 mb. Conclusions: The LMA leak test can be safely performed. The airway seal provided by the LMA is well maintained during surgery. The increase in LMA cuff pressure during surgery in the presence of N2O is small and probably is not a cause for clinical concern. If positive pressure is to applied in the presence of an LMA, one should limit this pressure to below the LMA leak pressure so as to lower the risk of inflating the stomach with gas that may than leak around the LMA.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 98
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MAINTENANCE OF AIRWAY SEALING PRESSURES OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN CHILDREN
    EPSTEIN, RH
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (3A) : A1322 - A1322
  • [2] The perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA™) provides better airway sealing pressures than the laryngeal mask airway (LMA®)
    Akca, O
    Wadhwa, A
    Sengupta, P
    Durrani, J
    Lenhardt, R
    Doufas, AG
    Hanni, K
    Sessler, DI
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (03) : B17 - B17
  • [3] The new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA™) is as efficient as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA™) but provides better airway sealing pressures
    Akça, O
    Wadhwa, A
    Sengupta, P
    Durrani, J
    Hanni, K
    Wenke, M
    Yücel, Y
    Lenhardt, R
    Doufas, AG
    Sessler, DI
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (01): : 272 - 278
  • [4] Pharyngeal mucosal pressures, airway sealing pressures, and fiberoptic position with the intubating versus the standard laryngeal mask airway
    Keller, C
    Brimacombe, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) : 1001 - 1006
  • [5] A Randomized Crossover Comparison of Airway Sealing with the Laryngeal Mask Airway Ambu AuraFlex at Three Intracuff Pressures in Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery
    Liu, Xiang
    Tan, Xiaona
    Zhang, Qi
    Qiao, Li
    Shi, Lei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (03) : 231 - 236
  • [6] Bronchoscopic airway evaluation facilitated by the laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients
    Badr, A
    Tobias, JD
    Rasmussen, GE
    Stokes, DC
    Neblett, WW
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 1996, 21 (01) : 57 - 61
  • [7] Partial airway obstruction by a pediatric laryngeal mask airway
    von Ungern-Sternberg, BS
    Erb, TO
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (03): : 951 - 951
  • [8] The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at three different intracuff pressures in children
    Choi, Kwan-Woong
    Lee, Jeong-Rim
    Oh, Jung-Tak
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Kim, Min-Soo
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (10) : 1080 - 1087
  • [9] Laryngeal mask airway for awake craniotomy in pediatric patients
    Brunson, CD
    Mayhew, JF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2005, 17 (02) : 149 - 150
  • [10] CAPNOMETRY AND THE PEDIATRIC LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY
    SPAHRSCHOPFER, IA
    BISSONNETTE, B
    HARTLEY, EJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (11): : 1038 - 1043