Comparative Economic Analysis of Concentrating Solar Technologies

被引:16
|
作者
Duquette, Brandon [1 ]
Otanicar, Todd [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Marymount Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA
[2] Univ Tulsa, Dept Mech Engn, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
关键词
HYBRID SYSTEM; HOT-WATER; EFFICIENCY; CELLS;
D O I
10.1115/1.4007936
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
One of the noted benefits of concentrating photovoltaics (PV) is the reduced cell area which results in reduction of the overall system cost. A variety of studies have looked at the cost for concentrating PV systems and made comparisons to concentrating solar thermal power plants, typically resulting in concentrating solar thermal power having lower system costs. Recently, a widespread design space was assessed for the potential efficiency improvements possible with a coupled hybrid PV/thermal solar energy system for electricity generation. The analysis showed that modest efficiency improvements could be made but no assessment of the economic impact was made. Although modest efficiency gains can be made, such a hybrid system requires more components than one of the conventional stand alone concentrating solar power plant on its own resulting in significantly different system costs. As a result, we look to compare the overall system costs of three different solar power technologies: concentrating PV, concentrating solar thermal, and the concentrating hybrid approach. Additionally, we will focus on documenting the necessary hybrid efficiencies to make a hybrid system competitive as well as the feasibility and means for achieving these efficiencies.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CONCENTRATING SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES
    Duquette, Brandon
    Otanicar, Todd
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2011, VOL 4, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 145 - 150
  • [2] Comparative analysis of concentrating solar power and photovoltaic technologies: Technical and environmental evaluations
    Desideri, U.
    Zepparelli, F.
    Morettini, V.
    Garroni, E.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 102 : 765 - 784
  • [3] Sensitivity analysis for concentrating solar power technologies
    Webby, B.
    [J]. 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2013), 2013, : 1496 - 1501
  • [4] Current energy mix and techno-economic analysis of concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies
    Huda, Nazmul
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [5] Concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Status and analysis
    Alami, Abdul Hai
    Olabi, A.G.
    Mdallal, Ayman
    Rezk, Ahmed
    Radwan, Ali
    Rahman, Shek Mohammod Atiqure
    Shah, Sheikh Khaleduzzaman
    Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali
    [J]. International Journal of Thermofluids, 2023, 18
  • [6] Concentrating Solar Power Technologies
    Raboaca, Maria Simona
    Badea, Gheorghe
    Enache, Adrian
    Filote, Constantin
    Rasoi, Gabriel
    Rata, Mihai
    Lavric, Alexandru
    Felseghi, Raluca-Andreea
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (06)
  • [7] Analysis of Gaps in Techno-Economic Analysis to Advance Heliostat Technologies for Concentrating Solar-Thermal Power
    Augustine, Chad
    Zolan, Alexander
    Armijo, Kenneth
    [J]. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2024, 146 (06):
  • [8] Current energy mix and techno-economic analysis of concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies in Malaysia
    Islam, Md Tasbirul
    Huda, Nazmul
    Saidur, R.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 140 : 789 - 806
  • [9] Comparative Environmental and Economic Analysis of Conventional and Nanofluid Solar Hot Water Technologies
    Otanicar, Todd P.
    Golden, Jay S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (15) : 6082 - 6087
  • [10] Operation Mode and Economic Analysis of Concentrating Solar Power Station
    Zhang Xingping
    Zhang Xiaoying
    Yang Yuanbo
    Wang Kun
    Chen Wei
    Wang Xiaolan
    [J]. 2019 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT GREEN BUILDING AND SMART GRID (IGBSG 2019), 2019, : 751 - 755