Optimal insurance contract and coverage levels under loss aversion utility preference

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Ching-Ping [2 ]
Huang, Hung-Hsi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiayi Univ, Dept Banking & Finance, Chiayi 60054, Taiwan
[2] Natl Kaohsiung Univ Appl Sci, Grad Inst Finance Econ & Business Decis, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
关键词
Economics of insurance; Economics of risk; Insurance mathematics; Insurance related products; Insurance science; Risk management; Utility functions; MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION; PROSPECT-THEORY; RISK CONSTRAINT; DESIGN; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/14697688.2011.564200
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study develops an optimal insurance contract endogenously and determines the optimal coverage levels with respect to deductible insurance, upper-limit insurance, and proportional coinsurance, and, by assuming that the insured has an S-shaped loss aversion utility, the insured would retain the enormous losses entirely. The representative optimal insurance form is the truncated deductible insurance, where the insured retains all losses once losses exceed a critical level and adopts a particular deductible otherwise. Additionally, the effects of the optimal coverage levels are also examined with respect to benchmark wealth and loss aversion coefficient. Moreover, the efficiencies among various insurances are compared via numerical analysis by assuming that the loss obeys a uniform or log-normal distribution. In addition to optimal insurance, deductible insurance is the most efficient if the benchmark wealth is small and upper-limit insurance if large. In the case of a uniform distribution that has an upper bound, deductible insurance and optimal insurance coincide if benchmark wealth is small. Conversely, deductible insurance is never optimal for an unbounded loss such as a log-normal distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:1615 / 1628
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Incentive Contract for Sales Team with Loss Aversion Preference
    Li, Chao
    Cheng, Si-Jie
    Cheng, Peng-Fei
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (07):
  • [2] The Bounds of Premium and A Fuzzy Insurance Model Under Risk Aversion Utility Preference
    Liu, Ying
    Li, Xiaozhong
    Wang, Dan
    Cui, Lixin
    [J]. 2017 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION, FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY (ICNC-FSKD), 2017,
  • [3] The Effects of Risk Preference and Loss Aversion on Individual Behavior under Bonus, Penalty, and Combined Contract Frames
    Brink, Alisa G.
    Rankin, Frederick W.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING, 2013, 25 (02) : 145 - 170
  • [4] Optimal incentive contracts under loss aversion and inequity aversion
    Zhou, Chi
    Peng, Jin
    Liu, Zhibing
    Dong, Binwei
    [J]. FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 18 (01) : 85 - 102
  • [5] Optimal incentive contracts under loss aversion and inequity aversion
    Chi Zhou
    Jin Peng
    Zhibing Liu
    Binwei Dong
    [J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2019, 18 : 85 - 102
  • [6] Optimal insurance under adverse selection and ambiguity aversion
    Koufopoulos, Kostas
    Kozhan, Roman
    [J]. ECONOMIC THEORY, 2016, 62 (04) : 659 - 687
  • [7] Optimal insurance under adverse selection and ambiguity aversion
    Kostas Koufopoulos
    Roman Kozhan
    [J]. Economic Theory, 2016, 62 : 659 - 687
  • [8] Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion
    Berkelaar, AB
    Kouwenberg, R
    Post, T
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2004, 86 (04) : 973 - 987
  • [9] Dynamic contract and discretionary termination policy under loss aversion
    Hori, Keiichi
    Osano, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2020, 111
  • [10] Optimal insurance contract design with "No-claim Bonus and Coverage Upper Bound" under moral hazard
    Ma, Benjiang
    Zhang, Yechun
    Qin, Yifang
    Bashir, Muhammad Farhan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 178