Lifestyle health promotion interventions for the nursing workforce: a systematic review

被引:62
|
作者
Chan, Choi Wan [1 ]
Perry, Lin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Hosp, Nursing Educ & Res Unit, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
cardiovascular; health promotion; health risk factors; lifestyle intervention; nursing workforce; systematic review; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; SMOKING-CESSATION; WORK-ENVIRONMENT; BLOOD-PRESSURE; WEIGHT-LOSS; ROLE-MODELS; JOB STRESS; NURSES; PROGRAMS; EXERCISE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04213.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives. Study aims were to identify the efficacy of lifestyle health promotion interventions intended to improve behavioural health risk factors and/or behavioural or clinical outcomes of working-age nurses. Background. Nurses constitute around half the health workforce but global shortages and an ageing profile challenge future supply. The occupational hazards and stresses of nursing are well known. Health promotion, possibly workplace-based, presents opportunities to safeguard the health of nurses. Design. This was a systematic review undertaken in line with guidance for reviews in health care. Methods. Seven electronic databases were searched from 20002011 and references of relevant papers. Two reviewers independently reviewed and critiqued retrieved papers and extracted data. Methodological features were described using the CONSORT checklists; risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook classification. Results. With design inclusion criteria relaxed to include an uncontrolled trial, only three intervention studies were retrieved, from the United States, Canada and Taiwan. All had limitations and high risk of bias, but benefits were reported. Outcomes included fewer cigarettes smoked during the intervention period, down from mean (SD) 20 (8)12 (9) per day (p < 0.001); significantly reduced fat mass (0.68 vs. 0.07 kg; p = 0.028); and significant gains across a battery of fitness assessments. The paucity of work focused on nurses health behaviours was the important finding. Conclusion. The workplace is a potentially fruitful location for health promotion intervention but nurses have seldom been recognised as a target participant group. Given the international priority ascribed to nursing workforce retention, this is a missed opportunity for occupational health planning. Potential benefits to nurses welfare and well-being may accrue from well-designed intervention studies. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurse leaders have a key role in driving recognition, spearheading commitment and development of targeted, whole-organisation programmes to promote health profile improvement for the nursing workforce.
引用
收藏
页码:2247 / 2261
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of Lifestyle Health Promotion Interventions for Nurses: A Systematic Review
    Stanulewicz, Natalia
    Knox, Emily
    Narayanasamy, Melanie
    Shivji, Noureen
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Blake, Holly
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [2] Nursing interventions in health promotion in primary care in Spain: a systematic review
    Escandell-Rico, Francisco Miguel
    Perez-Fernandez, Lucia
    [J]. RQR ENFERMERIA COMUNITARIA, 2023, 11 (02):
  • [3] Improving psychosocial health of nursing home residents: a systematic review of interventions for prevention and health promotion
    Nordhausen, Thomas
    Langner, Henriette
    Fleischer, Steffen
    Meyer, Gabriele
    Berg, Almuth
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2019, 147 : 7 - 19
  • [4] Postpartum Health Promotion Interventions A Systematic Review
    Fowles, Eileen R.
    Cheng, Hsiu-Rong
    Mills, Susan
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2012, 61 (04) : 269 - 282
  • [5] Improving cognitive resources of nursing home residents: a systematic review of prevention and health promotion interventions
    Langner, Henriette
    Nordhausen, Thomas
    Fleischer, Steffen
    Meyer, Gabriele
    Berg, Almuth
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2019, 149 : 1 - 11
  • [6] Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions
    Jackson, N
    Waters, E
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 20 (04) : 367 - 374
  • [7] Economic evaluation of workplace health promotion interventions focused on Lifestyle: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vargas-Martinez, Ana M.
    Romero-Saldana, Manuel
    De Diego-Cordero, Rocio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (09) : 3657 - 3691
  • [8] Evaluation of empowerment in health promotion interventions: a systematic review
    Lindacher, V.
    Curbach, J.
    Warrelmann, B.
    Brandstetter, S.
    Loss, J.
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2016, 78 : A96 - A96
  • [9] SEXUAL HEALTH PROMOTION INTERVENTIONS: RESULTS OF A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Hogben, M. S.
    Ford, J. V.
    Becasen, J.
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2013, 89 : A8 - A8
  • [10] Evaluation of Empowerment in Health Promotion Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Lindacher, Verena
    Curbach, Janina
    Warrelmann, Berit
    Brandstetter, Susanne
    Loss, Julika
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2018, 41 (03) : 351 - 392