PROSPECTIVE SCENARIOS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AT LISA, EMERALD, SCOPUS AND WEB OF SCIENCE

被引:1
|
作者
Araujo, Wagner Junqueira [1 ]
Targino Casimiro, Adelaide Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
关键词
Information management; Knowledge management; Scenarios; Lisa; Scopus; Web of Science; DEVELOPING FLAGSHIP MEGACITY; CHINA PROSPECTIVE SCENARIOS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; POWER-GENERATION; FUTURE; IMPLEMENTATION; TECHNOLOGIES; MANAGEMENT; ADOPTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.20396/rdbci.v18i0.8656945
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The aims of this study was to identify in the Emerald, Lisa, Scopus and Web of Science databases the documents that discuss the theme "prospective scenarios" and characterize them in terms of keywords, journals and authorship. The importance of the application of techniques for prospecting scenarios to identify strategic information and for the definition of priorities of organizations is a constant in recent years, because decision making is a complex activity, these depend on the survival of organizations in a competitive environment. This research is by nature applied, uses bibliographic sources and bibliometry as an aid in the meta-analysis of the results. The approach is quali-quantitative and has exploratory and descriptive objectives. For data collection and organization, a systematic review based on PRISMA was used, with temporality defined between 2009-2019. The result was 64 relevant texts, gathered in eight sub-themes, indexed by 208 keywords, with 229 authors from 26 different countries. The sub-themes converge to the concept of prospective scenarios and add multidisciplinarity to the method. The results indicate that the identified texts can be used as reference by companies and/or state organizations, provided that they are adapted to the realities found.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective scenarios: A literature review on the Scopus database
    Oliveira, Altina Silva
    de Barros, Marta Duarte
    Pereira, Fernando de Carvalho
    Simoes Gomes, Carlos Francisco
    da Costa, Helder Gomes
    [J]. FUTURES, 2018, 100 : 20 - 33
  • [2] Ballet, gender and sexuality: a systematic review in the scopus and web of science databases
    Oliveira Souza, Maria Thereza
    Pedroso, Bruno
    Dos Reis, Fabiana Della Giustina
    Capraro, Andre Mendes
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DANCE EDUCATION, 2022,
  • [3] Institutional and political communication on TikTok: Systematic review of scientific production in Web of Science and Scopus
    Morejon-Llamas, Noemi
    Ramos-Ruiz, Alvaro
    Cristofol, F. J.
    [J]. COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY-SPAIN, 2024, 37 (02): : 159 - 177
  • [4] Chatbots and ChatGPT: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review of publications in Web of Science and Scopus databases
    Khosravi, Hamed
    Shafie, Mohammad Reza
    Hajiabadi, Morteza
    Raihan, Ahmed Shoyeb
    Ahmed, Imtiaz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA MINING MODELLING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [5] Dating Violence: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature in Web of Science and Scopus
    Martinez-Heredia, Nazaret
    Gonzalez-Gijon, Gracia
    Soriano Diaz, Andres
    Amaro Agudo, Ana
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 10 (11):
  • [6] Artificial intelligence and journalism: Systematic review of scientific production in Web of Science and Scopus (2008-2019)
    Calvo Rubio, Luis Mauricio
    Ufarte Ruiz, Maria Jose
    [J]. COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY-SPAIN, 2021, 34 (02): : 159 - 176
  • [7] Web of Science and Scopus language coverage
    Vera-Baceta, Miguel-Angel
    Thelwall, Michael
    Kousha, Kayvan
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 121 (03) : 1803 - 1813
  • [8] Scopus vs. Web of Science
    Martek, Alisa
    [J]. KEMIJA U INDUSTRIJI-JOURNAL OF CHEMISTS AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2005, 54 (09): : 400 - 401
  • [9] Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?
    Thelwall, Mike
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2018, 12 (02) : 430 - 435
  • [10] Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?
    Thelwall, Mike
    [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12 (02): : 430 - 435