The minimum clinically important difference on the sleep disorders inventory for people with dementia

被引:4
|
作者
Webster, Lucy [1 ]
Martin, Alice [1 ]
Livingston, Gill [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Psychiat, Fac Brain Sci, Maple House,149 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NF, England
关键词
anchor; Delphi; dementia; distribution; minimum clinically important difference; sleep disorders inventory; sleep disturbances; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; DISTURBANCE; INTERVENTION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1002/gps.5384
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives Sleep disturbances in dementia causes distress to people with dementia and their family carers and are associated with care home admission. The Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) is a validated questionnaire of sleep disturbances in dementia often used to measure treatment effectiveness, but the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is unknown. Methods We triangulated three investigative methods to determine the MCID of the SDI. Using data on SDI from a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 62 participants in an intervention for sleep disorders in dementia, we (1) calculated distribution-based values where MCID = 0.33 of a SD (SD) (2) an anchor based approach using quality of life (measured using DEMQOL-Proxy) as an anchor. We also employed a Delphi consensus process asking 12 clinicians, sleep researchers and family carers to rate which changes on vignettes were equivalent to a MCID. Results We found that 0.33 SD in the SDI = 4.86. Reduction in SDI total score was not significantly correlated with improvement in DEMQOL-Proxy (Pearson's correlation = -0.01;P= 0.96) score. The Delphi consensus required two rounds to reach a consensus and concluded that changes equivalent to three points on the SDI equated to the MCID. Conclusions Taking into account both the distribution-based values and the Delphi process we used a whole number at the midpoint and judged the minimum clinically important difference MCID to be equal to four points. We note the clinicians and carers opinions from the Delphi process determined the MCID to be lower at three points.
引用
收藏
页码:1418 / 1423
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Brief Pain Inventory-Facial minimum clinically important difference
    Sandhu, Sukhmeet K.
    Halpern, Casey H.
    Vakhshori, Venus
    Mirsaeedi-Farahani, Keyvan
    Farrar, John T.
    Lee, John Y. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 122 (01) : 180 - 190
  • [2] Minimum clinically important difference
    Mattei, Tobias A.
    Fassett, Daniel R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (06) : 690 - 691
  • [3] Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia
    Ellen C. Lee
    Jessica Wright
    Stephen J. Walters
    Cindy L. Cooper
    Gail A. Mountain
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 2995 - 3005
  • [4] Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia
    Lee, Ellen C.
    Wright, Jessica
    Walters, Stephen J.
    Cooper, Cindy L.
    Mountain, Gail A.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (10) : 2995 - 3005
  • [5] Values of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire in Individuals with Dementia
    Mao, Hui-Fen
    Kuo, Chun-An
    Huang, Wen-Ni
    Cummings, Jeffrey L.
    Hwang, Tzung-Jeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 (07) : 1448 - 1452
  • [6] Minimum clinically important difference RESPONSE
    Highsmith, Jason M.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Dhall, Sanjay S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (06) : 691 - 691
  • [7] The Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    Patel, Suhani
    Kon, Samantha S. C.
    Nolan, Claire M.
    Barker, Ruth E.
    Simonds, Anita K.
    Morrell, Mary J.
    Man, William D. -C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197 (07) : 961 - 963
  • [8] Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Medical Studies
    Hedayat, A. S.
    Wang, Junhui
    Xu, Tu
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2015, 71 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [9] The rise and fall of the "minimum clinically important difference"
    Carragee, Eugene J.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (04): : 283 - 284
  • [10] Deconstructing the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID)
    Molino, Janine
    Harrington, Joseph
    Racine-Avila, Jennifer
    Aaron, Roy
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2022, 14 : 35 - 42