Techno-economic impacts of shale gas on cellulosic biofuel pathways

被引:27
|
作者
Brown, Tristan R. [1 ]
Wright, Mark M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Bioecon Inst, Biorenewable Res Lab 3116, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
Cellulosic biofuel; Shale gas; Techno-economic analysis; Uncertainty analysis; FAST PYROLYSIS; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; PRODUCTION COSTS; UNITED-STATES; BIOMASS; GASIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES; EMISSIONS; GASOLINE; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.032
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This analysis quantifies the economic feasibility of cellulosic biofuel pathways under fossil fuel price uncertainty. Eight pathway scenarios are developed on the basis of existing techno-economic analyses and projected fossil fuel commodity prices from the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) 2010 Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). A 20-year net present value (NPV) is then calculated for each pathway scenario. Uncertainty distributions are developed for each pathway scenario by fitting historical monthly price variance distribution curves for each fossil fuel commodity to their projected annual prices. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is completed by replacing the EIA's AEO 2010 projected prices with those from its AEO 2013, the latter incorporating recent exploitation of U. S. shale gas reserves into its projections. The results of this analysis indicate that fast pyrolysis scenarios see the greatest increase in estimated NPV value followed by gasification and acetic acid synthesis scenarios. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis scenarios remain largely unaffected by the updated EIA projections. Methanol-to-gasoline and enzymatic hydrolysis NPVs decrease as a result of lower projections for fossil fuel prices. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 995
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A techno-economic review of thermochemical cellulosic biofuel pathways
    Brown, Tristan R.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 178 : 166 - 176
  • [2] Stochastic techno-economic evaluation of cellulosic biofuel pathways
    Zhao, Xin
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Tyner, Wallace E.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 198 : 755 - 763
  • [3] Estimation of economic impacts of cellulosic biofuel production: a comparative analysis of three biofuel pathways
    Zhang, Yimin
    Goldberg, Marshall
    Tan, Eric
    Meyer, Pimphan Aye
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2016, 10 (03): : 281 - 298
  • [4] Techno-Economic Assessment of Benzene Production from Shale Gas
    Perez-Uresti, Salvador I.
    Adrian-Mendiola, Jorge M.
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    Jimenez-Gutierrez, Arturo
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2017, 5 (03):
  • [5] Data driven techno-economic framework for the development of shale gas resources
    Chebeir, J.
    Asala, H.
    Manee, V
    Gupta, I
    Romagnoli, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 72
  • [6] Techno-Economic Assessment and Environmental Impact of Shale Gas Alternatives to Methanol
    Julian-Duran, Laura M.
    Ortiz-Espinoza, Andrea P.
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    Jimenez-Gutierrez, Arturo
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2014, 2 (10): : 2338 - 2344
  • [7] Hydrogen storage in inactive horizontal shale gas wells: Techno-economic analysis for Haynesville shale
    Singh, Harpreet
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 313
  • [8] Techno-economic integration evaluation in shale gas development based on ensemble learning
    Niu, Wente
    Lu, Jialiang
    Sun, Yuping
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    Li, Qiaojing
    Cao, Xu
    Liang, Pingping
    Zhan, Hongming
    [J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 357
  • [9] Techno-economic integration evaluation in shale gas development based on ensemble learning
    Niu, Wente
    Lu, Jialiang
    Sun, Yuping
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    Li, Qiaojing
    Cao, Xu
    Liang, Pingping
    Zhan, Hongming
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 357
  • [10] Techno-economic assessment of supercritical processes for biofuel production
    Gutierrez Ortiz, Francisco Javier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS, 2020, 160