Responses of Feijoa Fruit 'Unique' to Controlled Atmosphere Storage

被引:0
|
作者
Al-Harthy, A. S. [1 ]
East, A. R. [1 ]
Hewett, E. W. [1 ]
Heyes, J. A. [1 ]
Mawson, A. J.
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Ctr Postharvest & Refrigerat Res, Inst Food Nutr & Human Hlth, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
Acca sellowiana; quality; firmness; maturity index; injury incidence; PSIDIUM-GUA[!text type='JAVA']JAVA[!/text;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The effects of controlled atmosphere (CA) on fruit quality of a commercially important cultivar of feijoa fruit, 'Unique', were studied during storage in five atmospheres containing: 0 kPa CO2, 2 kPa O-2; 3 kPa CO2, 2 kPa O-2; 0 kPa CO2, 5 kPa O-2; 3 kPa CO2, 5 kPa O-2; and air at 4 degrees C. Fruit were transferred to 20 degrees C after storage for 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks for a shelf life period of 7 days. For the entire period of storage fruit weight loss was approximately 1.6% of the initial weight. When fruit were transferred to 20 degrees C, rate of weight loss rapidly increased. From week 6 onwards fruit previously stored in CA lost less weight during shelf life than fruit stored in air. There was a decline in firmness in all fruit over the storage and shelf life period. Fruit stored in air softened faster (from about 14 N at week 4 to about 7 N at week 10) than in CA (16 N to 12 N). Fruit from all treatments developed an external skin discolouration after 6 weeks at 4 degrees C. There was no significant difference in skin colour between CA and air stored fruit. 'Unique' fruit stored in CA ripened more slowly than fruit in air. Despite these beneficial effects of CA, CA storage treatments used here did not appear to offer a significant benefit for 'Unique' in terms of the final outturn quality. All fruit were rated as over ripe after 6 weeks of storage regardless of treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 497
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined effects of pre-storage 1-methylcyclopropene application and controlled atmosphere storage on 'Unique' feijoa quality
    Rupavatharam, S.
    East, A. R.
    Heyes, J. A.
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2015, 43 (02) : 134 - 143
  • [2] The effect of controlled atmospheres on respiration and rate of quality change in 'Unique' feijoa fruit
    East, A. R.
    Araya, X. I. Trejo
    Hertog, M. L. A. T. M.
    Nicholson, S. E.
    Mawson, A. J.
    POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 53 (1-2) : 66 - 71
  • [3] Controlled Atmosphere Storage of Mango Fruit - an Overview
    Singh, Z.
    Zaharah, S. S.
    IX INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, 2013, 992 : 481 - 492
  • [4] A metabolomics approach to elucidate apple fruit responses to static and dynamic controlled atmosphere storage
    Brizzolara, Stefano
    Santucci, Claudio
    Tenori, Leonardo
    Hertog, Maarten
    Nicolai, Bart
    Stuerz, Stefan
    Zanella, Angelo
    Tonutti, Pietro
    POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 127 : 76 - 87
  • [5] Microbiological and Quality Responses of Strawberry Fruit to High CO2 Controlled Atmosphere and Modified Atmosphere Storage
    Nakata, Yuji
    Izumi, Hidemi
    HORTSCIENCE, 2020, 55 (03) : 386 - 391
  • [6] Storage of Zapote Mamey Fruit under Controlled Atmosphere
    Martinez-Morales, Arturo
    Alia-Tejacal, Iran
    Colinas-Leon, Maria-Teresa
    Martinez-Damian, Maria-Teresa
    HORTSCIENCE, 2004, 39 (04) : 806 - 806
  • [8] Aromatic profile of Feijoa (Feijoa sellowiana) fruit in protected cultivation, at harvest and after cold storage
    Hendges, Marcos Vinicius
    Moreira, Marcelo Alves
    Steffens, Cristiano Andre
    Talamini do Amarante, Cassandro Vidal
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2022, 293
  • [9] Effect of controlled atmosphere storage on ripening and quality of banana fruit
    Ahmad, Saeed
    Thompson, A. K.
    JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 81 (06): : 1021 - 1024
  • [10] Fruit quality of Brazilian genotypes of feijoa at harvest and after storage
    Talamini do Amarante, Cassandro Vidal
    de Souza, Alexandra Goede
    Beninca, Thalita Dal Toe
    Steffens, Cristiano Andre
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 52 (09) : 734 - 742