Oral azithromycin and oral doxycycline for the treatment of Meibomian gland dysfunction: A 9-month comparative case series

被引:27
|
作者
De Benedetti, Giacomo [1 ]
Vaiano, Agostino S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Baviera Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Azithromycin; blepharitis; doxycycline; Meibomian gland disease; tetracyclines; OCULAR SURFACE; TEAR; ROSACEA; CORNEAL; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS; SIGNS;
D O I
10.4103/ijo.IJO_1244_17
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety profile of oral azithromycin with that of doxycycline over 9 months in patients experiencing failure with conservative and topical treatment for Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), to assess recurrence of MGD, and to determine the number of treatments required. Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial with a cross-over design at a tertiary care center. In all, 115 consecutive patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination before being randomly assigned to oral treatment with doxycline (4 g for 30 days) or azithromycin (1.25 g for 5 days). Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, and 9 months. Therapy was switched or conservative management maintained according to signs and symptoms. Results: In the azithromycin group, 83.25% of the patients were stable after one treatment, 16.5% needed a further one or two treatments (some had previously been switched to doxycycline), and 5.77% did not improve despite treatment. In the doxycycline group, 33.79% of patients were stable after one treatment, 66.21% needed a further one or two treatments (some had previously switched to azithromycin), and 29.41% did not improve despite treatment (P < 0.05). Minimal gastrointestinal adverse effects (nausea, diarrhea, abdominal cramp, and decreased appetite) were reported, mostly unchanged at the follow-up visits. At the first visit, more adverse effects were reported in the doxycycline group (14/51, 24%) than in the azithromycin group (3/52, 6%; P < 0.005). Conclusion: Both antibiotics were effective and safe for treating patients with persistent MGD, although azithromycin was superior when the reduced dose and the shorter course of therapy (5 days vs. 4 weeks) were taken into consideration. Given the chronic nature of the disease and the improvement in some signs with minimal adverse effects, a shorter therapy seems a safer and more logical alternative to longer regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 471
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative study evaluating the efficacy of topical azithromycin versus oral doxycycline in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction
    Ahmad, Adnan
    Rehman, Mubashir
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 73 (05) : 995 - 999
  • [2] Oral Azithromycin versus Oral Doxycycline in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bukhari, Ziad M.
    Alsudais, Ali S.
    Bshnaq, Abdullatif Ghazi
    Alshabri, Meshari
    Alqurashi, Ahmed Ruwaybih
    Alghamdi, Amer M.
    Alshehri, Omar A.
    Bashrahil, Bader
    Alghamdi, Saeed
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 18 : 3353 - 3363
  • [3] Topical Azithromycin and Oral Doxycycline Therapy of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Comparative Clinical and Spectroscopic Pilot Study
    Foulks, Gary N.
    Borchman, Douglas
    Yappert, Marta
    Kakar, Shelley
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [4] Efficacy of azithromycin 1.5% eyedrops vs oral doxycycline in meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized trial
    Satitpitakul, Vannarut
    Ratanawongphaibul, Kitiya
    Kasetsuwan, Ngamjit
    Reinprayoon, Usanee
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 257 (06) : 1289 - 1294
  • [5] Efficacy of azithromycin 1.5% eyedrops vs oral doxycycline in meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized trial
    Vannarut Satitpitakul
    Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul
    Ngamjit Kasetsuwan
    Usanee Reinprayoon
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2019, 257 : 1289 - 1294
  • [6] The effect of azithromycin eye drops or oral doxycycline on tear film thickness in patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction
    Schmidl, Doreen
    Schlatter, Andreas
    Hommer, Nikolaus
    Kallab, Martin
    Stegmann, Hannes
    Zeller, Kristina
    Palkovits, Stefan
    Findl, Oliver
    Werkmeister, Rene Marcel
    Schmetterer, Leopold
    Garhofer, Gerhard
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [7] Effect of Treatment with Topical Azithromycin or Oral Doxycycline on Tear Film Thickness in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Schlatter, Andreas
    Hommer, Nikolaus
    Kallab, Martin
    Stegmann, Hannes
    Zeller, Kristina
    Palkovits, Stefan
    Findl, Oliver
    Werkmeister, Rene M.
    Schmetterer, Leopold
    Garhoefer, Gerhard
    Schmidl, Doreen
    JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 39 (06) : 371 - 378
  • [8] Pulsed Oral Azithromycin vs 6-Week Oral Doxycycline for Moderate to Severe Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Upaphong, Phit
    Tangmonkongvoragul, Chulaluck
    Phinyo, Phichayut
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 141 (05) : 423 - 429
  • [9] Efficacy of Topical Azithromycin versus Systemic Doxycycline in Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
    Zaky, Marwa Aly
    Zaky, Adel Galal
    Elsawy, Moataz Fayez
    Shehata, Kareem Fatehy
    Abd Elaziz, Mohamed Samy
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 2023
  • [10] Oral azithromycin as the systemic treatment of choice in the treatment of meibomian gland disease
    Al-Hity, Aws
    Lockington, David
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 44 (03): : 199 - 201