Neuraxial block versus general anaesthesia for cesarean section: post-operative pain scores and analgesic requirements

被引:0
|
作者
Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga [1 ]
Saracoglu, Ayten [1 ]
Umuroglu, Tumay [1 ]
Eti, Zeynep [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Analgesia; Post-operative pain; Cesarean delivery; Fentanyl; FENTANYL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the suitability of spinal and general anaesthesia for cesarean section. Methods: The prospective, double-blinded study, done between March and December 2009, at Central Education and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey, involved 60 patients undergoing elective cesarean surgery. They were grouped according to the kind of anaesthesia, with each group having 30 patients each. Postoperative pain scores, opioid requirement, side effects and patient satisfaction were compared through statistical analysis using SPSS version 10. Results: Patient demographics were similar in both groups. Patients in the general anaesthesia group consumed 638.4 +/- 179.10 mu g fentanyl, while patients in the spinal anaesthesia group consumed 356.3 +/- 87.1 mu g. The number of patients requiring opioid via Patient Controlled Analgesia in the first 24 hours was significantly higher in the general anaesthesia group. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the spinal anaesthesia group. Conclusion: Type of anaesthesia for elective cesarean section is important to provide sufficient post-operative analgesia and patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 444
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cesarean Section Incision Length and Post-Operative Pain
    Nicholls-Dempsey, Laura
    Abenhaim, Haim
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 200S - 200S
  • [2] Comparison of Tramadol Versus Tramadol and Paracetamol in Post-Operative Pain Management after Cesarean Section
    Salamat, Usman
    Khan, M. Baqir Ali
    Ali, Liaqat
    Nazeer, Tahir
    Tahir, Amna
    Zahid, Maimoona
    Shoaib, Muhammad
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (05): : 1035 - 1037
  • [3] Effect of the menstrual cycle phase on post-operative pain perception and analgesic requirements
    Ahmed, A.
    Khan, F.
    Ali, M.
    Haqnawaz, F.
    Hussain, A.
    Azam, S. I.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 56 (05) : 629 - 635
  • [4] Post-operative pain and use of analgesic agents in children following intrasulcular anaesthesia and various operative procedures
    M. Ashkenazi
    S. Blumer
    I. Eli
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2007, 202 : E13 - E13
  • [5] Post-operative pain and use of analgesic agents in children following intrasulcular anaesthesia and various operative procedures
    Ashkenazi, M.
    Blumer, S.
    Eli, I.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2007, 202 (05) : E13 - E13
  • [6] Post-operative pain and analgesic use in children
    D. Ram
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2007, 202 (5) : 276 - 277
  • [7] Minimising Post-Operative Analgesic Requirements Following RARP
    Masilamani, M. K. S.
    Sukumar, A.
    Chandrashekar, R.
    Cooke, P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 213 - 213
  • [8] PAIN IN THE POST-OPERATIVE OF CESAREAN: CLASSICAL TECHNIQUE VERSUS MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE
    Archangelo, Ivanildo, Jr.
    Vieira Archangelo, Silvania de Cassia
    Campos, Fabiola
    Ferreira, Lydia Masako
    Novo, Neil Ferreira
    Veiga, Daniela Francescato
    Schnaider, Taylor Brandao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 26 (04) : A4 - A5
  • [9] The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia after the cesarean section performed under general anesthesia
    Buluc, Halil
    Ar, Arzu Yildirim
    Turan, Guldem
    Karadogan, Firdevs
    Sargin, Mehmet Akif
    Akgun, Nur
    [J]. NORTHERN CLINICS OF ISTANBUL, 2019, 6 (04) : 368 - 373
  • [10] Effects of general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain
    Fabris, Lada Kalagac
    Maretic, Adriana
    [J]. PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2009, 111 (02) : 251 - 255