Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement

被引:518
|
作者
Lee, JW
Devanarayan, V
Barrett, YC
Weiner, R
Allinson, J
Fountain, S
Keller, S
Weinryb, I
Green, M
Duan, L
Rogers, JA
Millham, R
O'Brien, PJ
Sailstad, J
Khan, M
Ray, C
Wagner, JA
机构
[1] MDS Pharma Serv, Lincoln, NE USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Blue Bell, PA USA
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[4] BAS Analyt Ltd, Kenilworth, England
[5] Pfizer Global Res & Dev, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Prot Design Labs Inc, Fremont, CA USA
[7] Wyeth Res, Collegeville, PA USA
[8] Millenium Pharmaceut, Cambridge, MA USA
[9] Quest Pharmaceut Serv, Newark, DE USA
[10] Pfizer Global Res & Dev, Groton, CT USA
[11] Therakos Inc, Exton, PA USA
[12] Trimeris Inc, Morrisville, NC USA
[13] Covance Labs Inc, Chantilly, VA USA
[14] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[15] Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, NJ 07065 USA
关键词
assay validation; biomarkers; drug development; fit-for-purpose method development and validation;
D O I
10.1007/s11095-005-9045-3
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Despite major advances in modern drug discovery and development, the number of new drug approvals has not kept pace with the increased cost of their development. Increasingly, innovative uses of biomarkers are employed in an attempt to speed new drugs to market. Still, widespread adoption of biomarkers is impeded by limited experience interpreting biomarker data and an unclear regulatory climate. Key differences preclude the direct application of existing validation paradigms for drug analysis to biomarker research. Following the AAPS 2003 Biomarker Workshop (J. W. Lee, R. S. Weiner, J. M. Sailstad, et al. Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development. A conference report. Pharm Res 22:499-511, 2005), these and other critical issues were addressed. A practical, iterative, "fit-for-purpose" approach to biomarker method development and validation is proposed, keeping in mind the intended use of the data and the attendant regulatory requirements associated with that use. Sample analysis within this context of fit-for-purpose method development and validation are well suited for successful biomarker implementation, allowing increased use of biomarkers in drug development.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 328
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement
    Jean W. Lee
    Viswanath Devanarayan
    Yu Chen Barrett
    Russell Weiner
    John Allinson
    Scott Fountain
    Stephen Keller
    Ira Weinryb
    Marie Green
    Larry Duan
    James A. Rogers
    Robert Millham
    Peter J. O'Brien
    Jeff Sailstad
    Masood Khan
    Chad Ray
    John A. Wagner
    [J]. Pharmaceutical Research, 2006, 23 : 312 - 328
  • [2] Fit-for-purpose biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development
    Cummings, Jeffrey
    Ward, Tim H.
    Dive, Caroline
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2010, 15 (19-20) : 816 - 825
  • [3] Fit-for-purpose biomarker method validation for application in clinical trials of anticancer drugs
    J Cummings
    F Raynaud
    L Jones
    R Sugar
    C Dive
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2010, 103 : 1313 - 1317
  • [4] Fit-for-purpose biomarker method validation for application in clinical trials of anticancer drugs
    Cummings, J.
    Raynaud, F.
    Jones, L.
    Sugar, R.
    Dive, C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 103 (09) : 1313 - 1317
  • [5] Best practices for the development and fit-for-purpose validation of biomarker methods: a conference report
    Joel Mathews
    Lakshmi Amaravadi
    Steven Eck
    Lauren Stevenson
    Yow-Ming C. Wang
    Viswanath Devanarayan
    John Allinson
    Kelly Lundsten
    Michele Gunsior
    Yan G. Ni
    Marc-Olivier Pepin
    Audrey Gagnon
    Curtis Sheldon
    Paul C. Trampont
    Virginia Litwin
    [J]. AAPS Open, 8 (1)
  • [6] The practicalities of a 'fit-for-purpose' validation
    Burton, Neil K.
    Wood, Stephen A.
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2015, 7 (21) : 2735 - 2740
  • [7] Recommendations for Use and Fit-for-Purpose Validation of Biomarker Multiplex Ligand Binding Assays in Drug Development
    Jani, Darshana
    Allinson, John
    Berisha, Flora
    Cowan, Kyra J.
    Devanarayan, Viswanath
    Gleason, Carol
    Jeromin, Andreas
    Keller, Steve
    Khan, Masood U.
    Nowatzke, Bill
    Rhyne, Paul
    Stephen, Laurie
    [J]. AAPS JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [8] Fit-for-purpose biomarker immunoassay qualification and validation: three case studies
    Cowan, Kyra
    Gao, Xiaoying
    Parab, Vaishali
    Trung Nguy
    Wu, Lawren
    Arron, Joseph R.
    Townsend, Michael
    Wallin, Jeffrey
    Cheu, Melissa
    Morimoto, Alyssa
    Wakshull, Eric
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2016, 8 (22) : 2329 - 2340
  • [9] Recommendations for Use and Fit-for-Purpose Validation of Biomarker Multiplex Ligand Binding Assays in Drug Development
    Darshana Jani
    John Allinson
    Flora Berisha
    Kyra J. Cowan
    Viswanath Devanarayan
    Carol Gleason
    Andreas Jeromin
    Steve Keller
    Masood U. Khan
    Bill Nowatzke
    Paul Rhyne
    Laurie Stephen
    [J]. The AAPS Journal, 2016, 18 : 1 - 14
  • [10] A fit-for-purpose validation of a commercial radioimmunoassay for measurement of human peripheral oxytocin
    Gerred, Keenan
    Kapoor, Amita
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS REPORTS, 2024, 38