A systematic review and meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Tiantian [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Li, Li [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Chunhua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hosp, Dept Resp Med, 215 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Clin Ctr Nanjing Resp Dis & Imaging, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy; Non-small cell lung cancer; Stage III; Safety and efficacy; SINGLE-ARM; OPEN-LABEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; IMMUNOTHERAPY; MULTICENTER; NIVOLUMAB;
D O I
10.1186/s12890-022-02292-5
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease with different subtypes, multidisciplinary teams-led management, and a poor prognosis. Currently, the clinical benefits of stage III NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting are still unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of published data on neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III NSCLC to systematically evaluate its efficacy and safety. Methods: We searched the databases to identify eligible studies of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III NSCLC. The primary outcomes mainly included pathological and radiological response outcomes, the feasibility of surgery, and the safety of the regimen. The pathological and radiological response included the rate of major pathologic response (MPR), complete pathologic response (pCR), radiological response outcomes, and R0 resection; The feasibility included the rate of surgical resection, conversion to thoracotomy, surgical complications, pathological downstaging of clinical disease stage. The safety included the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs). R 4.1.3 software was conducted for data analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Nine trials containing a total of 382 populations were eligible for the meta-analysis, with the pooled surgical resection rate of 90%. Owing to the large heterogeneity of the single-rate meta-analysis, the random effect model was adopted. The estimated pooled prevalence of MPR was 56% (95%CI 0.39-0.72) and of pCR was 39% (95%CI 0.28-0.51). The pooled rate of TRAEs was 65% (95%CI 0.17-0.99) and SAEs was 24% (95%CI 0.05-0.49). Conclusion: Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy achieved more pathological and radiological relief, and has a high surgical resection rate and low risk of conversion to thoracotomy and surgical complications, with poor tolerance of toxicity but rarely developing life-threatening adverse events. In conclusion, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is suggested to be beneficial for stage III NSCLC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review and meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer
    Wei Liu
    Tiantian Zhang
    Qian Zhang
    Li Li
    Chunhua Xu
    [J]. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 22
  • [2] Neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Juan
    Wang, Yuling
    Gao, Yang
    Sugimura, Haruhiko
    Minervini, Fabrizio
    Uchino, Junji
    Halmos, Balazs
    Yendamuri, Sai
    Velotta, Jeffrey B.
    Li, Min
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (02) : 277 - +
  • [3] Neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Qunying
    Chen, Guini
    Liu, Yunzhong
    Zhou, Yu
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (09) : E33166
  • [4] Meta-Analysis Methods for Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Zhang, Leisheng
    Li, Jing
    Guo, Liang
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024,
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Syaj, S.
    Akhdar, M.
    Ababneh, O.
    Hamouri, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (09) : S235 - S236
  • [6] Meta-Analysis Methods for Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Reply
    Sorin, Mark
    Prosty, Connor
    Spicer, Jonathan D.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024,
  • [7] Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Syaj, Sebawe
    Akhdar, Marah
    Ababneh, Obada Ehab
    Hamouri, Shadi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [8] Surgical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aburaki, Riona
    Fujiwara, Yu
    Chida, Kohei
    Horita, Nobuyuki
    Nagasaka, Misako
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Ke
    Ni, Juan
    Wu, Xiaodi
    Xie, Jingyuan
    Chen, Mo
    Zhang, Fang
    Liu, Hongbing
    Zhan, Ping
    Lv, Tangfeng
    Song, Yong
    [J]. AME MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 7
  • [10] Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced, resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Yajing
    Verma, Vivek
    Gay, Carl M.
    Chen, Yujia
    Liang, Fei
    Lin, Qiang
    Wang, Jianing
    Zhang, Wei
    Hui, Zhouguang
    Zhao, Min
    Wang, Jun
    Chang, Joe Y.
    [J]. CANCER, 2023, 129 (13) : 1969 - 1985