Fuzzy acceptance sampling plans for inspection of geospatial data with ambiguity in quality characteristics

被引:24
|
作者
Tong, Xiaohua [1 ]
Wang, Zhenhua
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Surveying & Geo Informat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fuzzy acceptance sampling plan; Triangular fuzzy number; Quality control; VARIANCE; ERROR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2012.01.013
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper presents a method for designing a fuzzy acceptance sampling plan (FASP) for the case where sampling parameters are defined as fuzzy numbers, in particular for quality inspection of geospatial data with ambiguous quality characteristics. In contrast to existing fuzzy sampling plans that concentrate solely on ambiguity in the fraction of nonconforming items, the proposed method includes three cases with different fuzzy sampling parameters. These are the fuzzy fraction of nonconforming items, fuzzy sample rate, and fuzzy fraction of nonconforming items and fuzzy sample rate together. The design of the fuzzy sampling plan is modeled as a fuzzy optimization problem dealing with two cases in terms of lot size based on the fuzzy Hypergeometric and Poisson distributions. The proposed method is implemented to design fuzzy sampling plans for quality inspection of geospatial mineral products in Qinghai Province, China. The results show that (1) the proposed method has the advantage of performing quality inspection for geospatial data products with uncertain parameters; (2) in contrast to a traditional sampling plan having a single OC-curve, the OC-band of a fuzzy sampling plan has the lower and upper bounds; and (3) in contrast to existing fuzzy sampling plans which account primarily for uncertainty in the fraction of nonconforming items, the proposed method completely covers fuzzy sampling parameters. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 266
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Designing a two-rank acceptance sampling plan for quality inspection of geospatial data products
    Tong, Xiaohua
    Wang, Zhenhua
    Xie, Huan
    Liang, Dan
    Jiang, Zuoqin
    Li, Jinchao
    Li, Jun
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2011, 37 (10) : 1570 - 1583
  • [2] Statistical Quality Control: Acceptance Sampling Plans in the Light of Fuzzy Mathematics
    Surajit Bhattacharyya
    [J]. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 2023, 22 : 170 - 212
  • [3] Statistical Quality Control: Acceptance Sampling Plans in the Light of Fuzzy Mathematics
    Bhattacharyya, Surajit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 22 (03): : 170 - 212
  • [4] Inspection tables for single acceptance sampling with crisp and fuzzy formulation of quality limits
    Chukhrova, Nataliya
    Johannssen, Arne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 35 (09) : 1755 - 1791
  • [5] Design of economically optimal acceptance sampling plans with inspection error
    Ferrell, WG
    Chhoker, A
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (10) : 1283 - 1300
  • [6] DESIGN OF ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING PLANS UNDER VARYING INSPECTION ERROR
    SHIN, WS
    LINGAYAT, S
    [J]. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1992, 24 (02) : 111 - 120
  • [7] MULTIATTRIBUTE BAYESIAN ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING PLANS UNDER NONDESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION
    TANG, K
    PLANTE, R
    MOSKOWITZ, H
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (06) : 739 - 750
  • [8] Acceptance sampling inspection plan for the Lindley and power Lindley distributed quality characteristics
    Saha, Mahendra
    Tripathi, Harsh
    Dey, Sanku
    Maiti, Sudhansu S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (06) : 1410 - 1419
  • [9] Acceptance sampling inspection plan for the Lindley and power Lindley distributed quality characteristics
    Mahendra Saha
    Harsh Tripathi
    Sanku Dey
    Sudhansu S. Maiti
    [J]. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2021, 12 : 1410 - 1419
  • [10] Acceptance sampling plans by variables for vague data
    Grzegorzewski, P
    [J]. SOFT METHODS IN PROBABILITY, STATISTICS AND DATA ANALYSIS, 2002, : 197 - 206