Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis

被引:7
|
作者
Shavelle, DM
Salami, A
Abdelkarim, M
French, WJ
Shook, TL
Mayeda, GS
Burstein, S
Matthews, RV
机构
[1] Hosp Good Samaritan, Div Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA 90017 USA
[2] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
关键词
myocardial infarction; rescue angioplasty; thrombolytic therapy;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.20583
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for failed thrombolysis yielded conflicting results. In the current era of newer thrombolytic agents, coronary stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and aggressive hemodynamic support, the outcome of this high-risk patient group has not been characterized. Methods: From January 2000 to October 2004, 214 consecutive patients were transferred and underwent emergent coronary angiography following failed thrombolysis. One hundred and fifty five (72%) underwent immediate PCI, 23 (11%) underwent delayed PCI, and 36 (17%) received surgical revascularization or medical therapy. Medical records and angiograms for the entire PCI cohort (n = 178) were reviewed for in-hospital events including bleeding complications, stroke, recurrent ischemia or myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and death. Results: Time from symptom onset to thrombolysis (mean +/- standard deviation) was 5.6 +/- 11.9 hr, and time from thrombolysis to angiography was 7.0 +/- 5.5 hr. The study cohort was critically ill, with 9.6% experiencing cardiac arrest, 21% in cardiogenic shock, and 12% intubated prior to transfer Coronary stents were placed in 88%, Rheolytic thrombectomy was used in 21%, an intra-aortic balloon pump was placed in 17%, and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was administered in 92%. Patients receiving delayed PCI had higher TIMI 3 flow grade at initial angiography than those receiving immediate PCI (83% vs. 34%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Angiographic success was 90% for the entire PCI cohort, 89% for the immediate PCI group, and 100% for the delayed PCI group. Clinical success (angiographic success and freedom from major adverse cardiac events) was 85% for the entire PCI cohort, 83% for the immediate PCI group, and 100% for the delayed PCI group. Severe and moderate bleeding complications occurred in 7.3%, stroke in 1.7%, recurrent ischemia or MI in 7.3%, and TVR in 3.4%. Overall, in-hospital mortality for the entire PCI cohort was 3.4%. Conclusions: This observational, consecutive, real-world study of contemporary rescue PCI for failed thrombolysis shows a high use of coronary stents, Rheolytic thrombectomy, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and intraaortic balloon pump placement. Angiographic and clinical success was high with low bleeding complications and low in-hospital mortality, suggesting that prospective, randomized trials using contemporary interventional therapy for rescue PCI be considered. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 220
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis in a patient with anomalous coronary arteries
    Mazzari, M
    Biondi-Zoccai, GGL
    Burzotta, F
    Trani, C
    Ramazzotti, V
    Romagnoli, E
    Savino, M
    Abbate, A
    Parisi, Q
    Rebuzzi, AG
    Mongiardo, R
    Crea, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (02) : 325 - 326
  • [2] The safety and effectiveness of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis in older population
    Celik, Turgay
    Iyisoy, Atila
    Celik, Murat
    Yuksel, U. Cagdas
    Isik, Ersoy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 125 (02) : 288 - 289
  • [3] Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: results from a district general hospital
    Balachandran, KP
    Miller, J
    Pell, ACH
    Vallance, BD
    Oldroyd, KG
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 78 (920) : 330 - 334
  • [4] Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed thrombolysis: Results from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israel Survey (ACSIS)
    Yalonetsky, S
    Gruberg, L
    Hammerman, H
    Beyar, R
    Hod, H
    Behan, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (6A): : 71L - 71L
  • [5] Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed thrombolysis versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausarzte
    Vogt, A
    Niederer, W
    Engel, HJ
    Heinrich, KW
    Bonzel, T
    Uebis, R
    Gottwik, M
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 341 - 341
  • [6] Repeat thrombolysis or conservative therapy vs. rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Testa, L.
    Van Gaal, W. J.
    Biondi-Zoccai, G. G. L.
    Abbate, A.
    Agostoni, P.
    Bhindi, R.
    Banning, A. P.
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 101 (05) : 387 - 395
  • [7] Factors influencing left ventricular function following successful rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction
    Balachandran, KP
    Berry, C
    O'Halloran, D
    Vallance, D
    Malekianpour, M
    Gilbert, TJ
    Pell, ACH
    Oldroyd, KG
    HEART, 2005, 91 : A24 - A24
  • [8] EMERGENCY RESCUE PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY AFTER FAILED THROMBOLYSIS WITH STREPTOKINASE - EARLY AND LATE RESULTS
    HOLMES, DR
    GERSH, BJ
    BAILEY, KR
    REEDER, GS
    BRESNAHAN, JF
    BRESNAHAN, DR
    VLIETSTRA, RE
    CIRCULATION, 1990, 81 (03) : 51 - 56
  • [9] Coronary stenting during rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolysis
    Moreno, R
    García, E
    Abeytua, M
    Soriano, J
    Elizaga, J
    Botas, J
    López-Sendón, JL
    Delcán, JL
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 1999, 47 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [10] Evaluating the Risk of a Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Thrombolysis Therapy: A Decision Tree Approach
    Lagani, V.
    Ceravlo, R.
    Vatrano, M.
    Cleonte, V. A.
    Conforti, D.
    COMPUTERS IN CARDIOLOGY 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 275 - +