Preliminary numerical analysis for a naphtha co-injection test during SAGD

被引:0
|
作者
Boak, J. [1 ]
Palmgren, C.
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Injury Biomech Lab, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Petro Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is a steam-flood process that relies on thermal diffusion and gravity to mobilize bitumen in oil sands reservoirs and allow for recovery. A pair of parallel horizontal wells are drilled near the bottom of the pay zone with approximately 5 in vertical separation between them. After an initial circulation phase to establish communication, high quality steam is continuously injected down the injection well while the heated bitumen and condensate flow to the production well as a result of gravity. The volume of low oil saturation left behind is filled with steam and referred to as the steam chamber. The steam chamber grows vertically until it hits the cap-rock at which point it grows laterally away from the horizontal wells((1)). A major cost of producing bitumen by SAGD is the energy required to produce steam; thus there is a great drive to improve the energy efficiency of a SAGD project. Solvent addition is expected to increase oil production and improve the energy efficiency of SAGD by combining the thermal process with the diluent mechanism of a solvent((2)). A solvent is added to the steam chamber by injecting the solvent-steam mixture continuously from the injector well((3)). Reservoir simulations of solvent-steam co-injection were done with a pseudo-compositional thermal reservoir simulator. The effects of co-injecting a multi-component solvent, naphtha, and a single component solvent, propane or pentane, were compared to SAGD. Three pseudo-components were used to model the multicomponent behaviour of naphtha. Co-injection of any of the solvents studied (propane, pentane, naphtha) resulted in an improved SOR. The greater the mole ratio of solvent to steam, the greater the improvement in SOR. Only naphtha co-injection resulted in an improved oil production rate. All components of naphtha travelled freely in the vapour chamber and accumulated along the vapour chamber front in both the vapour and oil phases. At higher solvent to steam ratios, the oil production rate decreased due to an accumulation of solvent gas at the vapour chamber front.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 19
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Heavy oil recovery efficiency using SAGD, SAGD with propane co-injection and STRIP-SAGD
    Voskov, Denis
    Zaydullin, Rustem
    Lucia, Angelo
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 88 : 115 - 125
  • [2] Solvent co-injection in SAGD: Prediction of some operational issues
    Thimm, HF
    JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 44 (09): : 7 - 10
  • [3] Effect of Methane Co-Injection in SAGD-Analytical and Simulation Study
    Sharma, Jyotsna
    Moore, R. G.
    Mehta, Raj
    SPE JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (03): : 687 - 704
  • [4] Reducing the Energy and Steam Consumption of SAGD Through Cyclic Solvent Co-Injection
    Jaimes, Diego Manfre
    Gates, Ian D.
    Clarke, Matthew
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (20)
  • [6] Numerical simulation of cavity filling in co-injection molding
    Zhou, Guo-Fa
    Liu, He-Sheng
    He, Cheng-Hong
    Sun, Mao
    Zhongguo Suliao/China Plastics, 2001, 15 (12):
  • [7] Henry's law near the critical point of water - Applications in solvent co-injection with SAGD
    Thimm, HF
    JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 45 (01): : 10 - 13
  • [8] Three-dimensional numerical modeling of co-injection molding
    Ilinca, F
    Hétu, JF
    INTERNATIONAL POLYMER PROCESSING, 2002, 17 (03) : 265 - 270
  • [9] Numerical simulation of the flow behavior and breakthrough phenomenon in co-injection molding
    Ilinca, Florin
    Hetu, Jean-Francois
    NUMIFORM '07: MATERIALS PROCESSING AND DESIGN: MODELING, SIMULATION AND APPLICATIONS, PTS I AND II, 2007, 908 : 313 - +
  • [10] The Bi-phasic Numerical Simulation of Metal Co-injection Molding
    Cheng, Z. Q.
    Barriere, T.
    Liu, B. S.
    Gelin, J. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIAL FORMING, 2008, 1 (Suppl 1) : 695 - 698