Influence of Dicamba and Dicamba plus Glyphosate Combinations on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis)

被引:27
|
作者
Spaunhorst, Douglas J. [1 ]
Bradley, Kevin W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Plant Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Treatment timing; biomass reduction; days after the initial herbicide treatment; dicamba plus glyphosate; dicamba rate; sequential treatments; weed control; FOXTAIL SETARIA-VIRIDIS; HERBICIDE PROGRAMS; WEED MANAGEMENT; GLYCINE-MAX; GROWTH; 2,4-D; INTERFERENCE; RATES; CORN;
D O I
10.1614/WT-D-13-00081.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A total of four field experiments were conducted over a 2-yr period (2011 and 2012) near Mokane and Moberly, Missouri, to determine the control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) waterhemp with dicamba and glyphosate applied alone or as a tankmix combination. In one experiment, dicamba was applied at 0.14, 0.28, 0.42, and 0.56 kg ae ha(-1) with or without 0.86 kg ae ha(-1) glyphosate to GR waterhemp plants 7.5, 15, and 30 cm in height. In a second experiment, sequential treatments of dicamba or dicamba plus glyphosate were applied 4, 7, and 14 d after the initial herbicide treatment to plants measuring either 7.5 or 23 cm in height. Control of GR waterhemp ranged from 7 to 62%, 11 to 40%, and 8 to 30% when applied to 7.5-, 15-, and 30-cm plants, respectively. Control of 7.5-cm GR waterhemp increased by 16 to 36%, and biomass reduction increased by 29 to 52% in response to 0.14, 0.28, 0.42, and 0.56 kg ha(-1) dicamba plus glyphosate compared to these same rates of dicamba alone. When sequential dicamba-containing treatments were averaged across all treatments and application timings, GR waterhemp control ranged from 46 to 47 %, and biomass reduction ranged from 55 to 66 %. No differences in control were observed based on the timing of the sequential herbicide treatment. However, in terms of GR waterhemp biomass reduction, sequential treatments applied 4 d after the initial treatment reduced GR waterhemp biomass more than sequential treatments applied 14 d after the initial treatment. Results from these experiments indicate that, in the absence of crop competition, a single treatment of dicamba up to 0.56 kg ha(-1) provides less than 62% control of GR waterhemp, and sequential dicamba plus glyphosate treatments targeting 7.5 cm plants are required to achieve at least 72% control.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 681
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of glyphosate/dicamba application rate and timing on the control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Hooker, David C.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (03) : 371 - 374
  • [2] Control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var rudis) with dicamba and dimethenamid-P in Ontario
    Schryver, Mike G.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Tranel, Patrick J.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 98 (02) : 362 - 369
  • [3] Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (06) : 678 - 682
  • [4] Control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp with preemergence herbicides in glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [5] Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Management in Dicamba-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)
    Spaunhorst, Douglas J.
    Siefert-Higgins, Simone
    Bradley, Kevin W.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 131 - 141
  • [6] Confirmation and Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in Nebraska
    Sarangi, Debalin
    Sandell, Lowell D.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    Aulakh, Jatinder S.
    Lindquist, John L.
    Irmak, Suat
    Jhala, Amit J.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (01) : 82 - 92
  • [7] Glyphosate-Resistant Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Confirmed in Texas
    Light, G. G.
    Mohammed, M. Y.
    Dotray, P. A.
    Chandler, J. M.
    Wright, R. J.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) : 480 - 485
  • [8] Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean
    Jhala, Amit J.
    Sandell, Lowell D.
    Sarangi, Debalin
    Kruger, Greg R.
    Knezevic, Steven Z.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) : 32 - 45
  • [9] Glyphosate-Resistant Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Control and Economic Returns with Herbicide Programs in Soybean
    Legleiter, Travis R.
    Bradley, Kevin W.
    Massey, Raymond E.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [10] Effect of row spacing and herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in dicamba/glyphosate-resistant soybean
    McDonald, Shawn T.
    Striegel, Adam
    Chahal, Parminder S.
    Jha, Prashant
    Rees, Jennifer M.
    Proctor, Christopher A.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (05) : 790 - 801